Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Labour Court Cape Town

General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council v Ngcaba NO (C380/2020) [2021] ZALCCT 73 (5 October 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The respondent, as arbitrator, was under a statutory obligation to issue arbitration awards within 14 days of the conclusion of the hearings in terms of section 138(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act. His failure to do so, despite repeated requests and interventions, constitutes an unreasonable delay in the performance of an administrative function. The Labour Court, exercising its supervisory and review powers under section 158(1)(g) of the LRA and sections 6(3) and 8(2) of PAJA, is empowered to compel the respondent to issue and deliver the outstanding awards. The respondent's lack of opposition and failure to respond left the applicant with no alternative but to approach the court, justifying an order for costs against the respondent.

Court disposition

Application granted. Respondent ordered to issue and deliver outstanding arbitration awards and to pay costs.

Orders

  • The respondent is declared in breach of his obligation under section 138(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act to issue awards for arbitration cases GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019.
  • The respondent's failure is reviewed and he is ordered to issue and deliver his awards in respect of arbitration cases GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019 within 30 days of receipt of this order.
  • The respondent must pay the applicant's costs on the unopposed scale.

02

Material facts

Parties

General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council

Applicant

Franklin Ngcaba N.O

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Review Application / Application to Compel Issuance of Arbitration Awards

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contends that the respondent, as arbitrator, is legally required under section 138(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act to issue awards within 14 days of the conclusion of hearings. Despite repeated requests and interventions, including approaching the CCMA, the respondent has failed to deliver the awards for cases GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019. The applicant submits that this delay is unreasonable and seeks an order compelling the respondent to issue the awards and to pay costs.
Respondent
The respondent did not oppose the application and provided no representation. The only explanation previously given was that his laptop required repairs, but no further response or action was taken.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, s 138(7)(a)

    An arbitrator is legally obliged to issue an award within 14 days of the end of a hearing.

  2. 02

    Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, s 158(1)(g)

    The Labour Court may review the performance or purported performance of any function provided for in the Act on any grounds permissible in law.

  3. 03

    Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000, s 6(3)

    Where an administrator is required to take a decision within a particular time, failure to do so may be remedied by the court in the exercise of its review powers relating to unreasonable delay.

  4. 04

    Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000, s 8(2)

    In review proceedings, a court may grant any order that is just and equitable, including directing the taking of a decision.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The respondent, as arbitrator, was under a statutory obligation to issue arbitration awards within 14 days of the conclusion of the hearings in terms of section 138(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act. His failure to do so, despite repeated requests and interventions, constitutes an unreasonable delay in the performance of an administrative function. The Labour Court, exercising its supervisory and review powers under section 158(1)(g) of the LRA and sections 6(3) and 8(2) of PAJA, is empowered to compel the respondent to issue and deliver the outstanding awards. The respondent's lack of opposition and failure to respond left the applicant with no alternative but to approach the court, justifying an order for costs against the respondent.

Obiter and limits

  • Statutory arbitration proceedings are a form of administrative action subject to judicial review.
  • The court's supervisory function over arbitrators ensures compliance with statutory obligations and prevents unreasonable delays.

Court disposition

Application granted. Respondent ordered to issue and deliver outstanding arbitration awards and to pay costs.

  • The respondent is declared in breach of his obligation under section 138(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act to issue awards for arbitration cases GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019.
  • The respondent's failure is reviewed and he is ordered to issue and deliver his awards in respect of arbitration cases GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019 within 30 days of receipt of this order.
  • The respondent must pay the applicant's costs on the unopposed scale.

Source and reliance status

Labour Court Cape Town

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Labour Court Cape Town

Judgment

[2021] ZALCCT 73

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA,

HELD

AT CAPE TOWN

Of interest to other judges

Case : C 380/2020

In the matter between:

GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE

SECTORAL BARGAINING COUNCIL Applicant

and

FRANKLIN NGCABA N.O Respondent

Date of Hearing: 05 October 2021

Date of Judgment: This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ legal representatives by email, publication on the Labour Court website and release to SAFLII. The date and time for handing down judgment is deemed to be 14h00 on 5 October 2021

Summary: (Application to compel the issuing of an award – Relief competent within the court’s review powers under s 158(1)(g) of the Labour Relations Act, read with s 6(3) and 8(2) of the Administrative Justice Act – Arbitrator legally obliged to issue award within 14 days under s 138(7)(a))

JUDGMENT

LAGRANGE J

Introduction

[1] This is an unopposed application to compel the respondent to issue and deliver two outstanding arbitration awards in respect of matters in which he presided as an arbitrator. The applicant requested that the matter be decided on the papers. No opposition or representation has been received by the respondent.

[2] The arbitration case numbers are GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019, in which awards should have been issued by 10 July 2019 and 17 July 2019 respectively.

[3] Since August 2019, the applicant has made several requests and efforts to compel the respondent to issue arbitration awards in both matters, including requesting the intervention of the CCMA. None of these attempts bore any fruit and the respondent has not responded to any of the approaches since 8 August 2019 when he attributed the delay to his laptop having to be repaired.

[4] As a last resort, the applicant has approached the court to order the respondent to issue and deliver awards in both matters. It is well established that this court exercises a supervisory function over statutory arbitration proceedings which are a form of administrative action.

[5] An arbitrator is legally obliged to issue an award within 14 days of the end of a hearing under s 138(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (‘the LRA’). Section 158(1)(g) of the LRA, provides that: “… subject to section 145, review the performance or purported performance of any function provided for in this Act on any grounds that are permissible in law.”

[6] Section 6 [3] of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (‘PAJA’) specifically provides that where an administrator is required to take a decision within a particular time, the failure to do so can be remedied by the court in the exercise of its review powers relating to an unreasonable delay in taking the decision. Section 8 [2] of the same Act provides that in such review proceedings a court may grant an order that is just and equitable including orders directing the taking of a decision.

[7] In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the issuing of an award by an arbitrator under s 138(7)(a) concerns the performance of a function under the LRA and the failure to perform that function may be reviewed and remedied under s 6(3) read with s8(2) of PAJA.

[8] On the question of costs, as the respondent has not opposed the matter, but has left the applicant no choice but to bring this application, he should pay the applicant’s costs on the unopposed scale.

Order

[1] The Respondent is in breach of his obligation under s 138(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 to issue awards in respect of arbitration cases numbers GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019.

[2] Accordingly, the Respondent’s failure to do so is reviewed and he must issue and deliver his awards in respect of arbitration cases numbers GPBC 71/2019 and GPBC 116/2019 within 30 days of receipt of this order.

[3] The Respondent must pay the Applicant’s costs, on the unopposed scale.

Lagrange J

Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.