Genlloud and Others v Van Der Merwe and Others (39708/2020) [2024] ZAGPJHC 661 (20 June 2024)

Genlloud and Others v Van Der Merwe and Others (39708/2020) [2024] ZAGPJHC 661 (20 June 2024)

The court found that the Plaintiffs failed to discharge the burden of proving that Joyce and Leslie Genlloud lacked testamentary capacity when executing their Wills, Codicils, and the Cradlestone Agreement. There was no credible medical or expert evidence to support incapacity, and the evidence of witnesses, including the domestic worker and family members, indicated that both were of sound mind at the relevant times. The Plaintiffs were aware of the joint Will and estate transfers since 2012 but did not object or institute proceedings until 2020, resulting in prescription of their claim. The Cradlestone Agreement was valid, reflecting the testator's intention and was entered into at a...

Citation
[2024] ZAGPJHC 661
Parties
Plaintiff: Gavin Sean Genlloud; Plaintiff: Sharon Ruth Ffoulkes; Plaintiff: Nicola Jayne Sinclair; Plaintiff: Kyle Brent Genlloud; Plaintiff: Tegan Cai Genlloud; Plaintiff: Robyn Jean Sinclair; Plaintiff: Alasdair Leslie Sinclair; Defendant: Herman Van Der Merwe N.O; Defendant: John Bruckman N.O; Defendant: Graham Andrew Genlloud; Defendant: Cradlestone Development; Defendant: Master of the High Court; Defendant: Registrar of Deeds; Defendant: Richard Graham Genlloud; Defendant: Aysha-Leigh Genlloud; Defendant: Shaun Charles Genlloud; Defendant: Candice Cohoe
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 June 2024
Case Number
39708/2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Judges
Moila
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Validity of Wills, Intestate Succession, Prescription, Sale of Land, Estate Administration
Land and Property Civil Procedure Family and Children Testamentary Capacity Validity of Wills Intestate Succession Prescription Sale of Land +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gavin Sean Genlloud

Plaintiff

Sharon Ruth Ffoulkes

Plaintiff

Nicola Jayne Sinclair

Plaintiff

Kyle Brent Genlloud

Plaintiff

Tegan Cai Genlloud

Plaintiff

Robyn Jean Sinclair

Plaintiff

Alasdair Leslie Sinclair

Plaintiff

Herman Van Der Merwe N.O

Defendant

John Bruckman N.O

Defendant

Graham Andrew Genlloud

Defendant

Cradlestone Development

Defendant

Master of the High Court

Defendant

Registrar of Deeds

Defendant

Richard Graham Genlloud

Defendant

Aysha-Leigh Genlloud

Defendant

Shaun Charles Genlloud

Defendant

Candice Cohoe

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the joint Will of Joyce and Leslie Genlloud was invalid due to lack of testamentary capacity.
  2. 2 Whether the testator and testatrix were of sound mind when executing their Wills, Codicils, and the Cradlestone Agreement.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiffs' main claim had prescribed under the Prescription Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiffs failed to discharge the burden of proving that Joyce and Leslie Genlloud lacked testamentary capacity when executing their Wills, Codicils, and the Cradlestone Agreement. There was no credible medical or expert evidence to support incapacity, and the evidence of witnesses, including the domestic worker and family members, indicated that both were of sound mind at the relevant times. The Plaintiffs were aware of the joint Will and estate transfers since 2012 but did not object or institute proceedings until 2020, resulting in prescription of their claim. The Cradlestone Agreement was valid, reflecting the testator's intention and was entered into at a...