George Municipality v IMATU obo Bennet and Others (C385/2022) [2025] ZALCCT 27 (24 April 2025)
The court found that the arbitrator's decision that the applicant committed an unfair labour practice in appointing Kiewit, who did not meet the minimum NQF Level 7 qualification, was reasonable and justified on the facts and law. The applicant's reliance on clause 8.4.2 of its Recruitment and Selection Policy was not documented in the recruitment process or appointment letter, and the evidence supported the respondents' contention that such conditions were generally recorded. The arbitrator's findings were supported by the transcript and uncontroverted evidence, and the applicant failed to demonstrate any gross irregularity or misconduct. The review application was accordingly dismissed.
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCCT 27
- Parties
- Applicant: George Municipality; Respondent: IMATU obo Avril Bennet; Respondent: SAMWU obo Nozuko Williams; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Commissioner Elviso Adams N.O; Respondent: Jenny Kiewit
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2025
- Case Number
- C385/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The review application is dismissed. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- G Cassells
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Labour Practice, Promotion Dispute, Review of Arbitration Award, Municipal Systems Act, Managerial Prerogative
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Municipality
Applicant
IMATU obo Avril Bennet
Respondent
SAMWU obo Nozuko Williams
Respondent
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Commissioner Elviso Adams N.O
Respondent
Jenny Kiewit
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator committed a gross irregularity or misconduct in finding that the applicant committed an unfair labour practice in appointing Kiewit.
- 2 Whether the appointment of Kiewit, who did not meet the minimum NQF Level 7 qualification, constituted an unfair labour practice depriving Bennet of promotion.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator's award was one that a reasonable decision maker could have made based on the evidence and law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the arbitrator's decision that the applicant committed an unfair labour practice in appointing Kiewit, who did not meet the minimum NQF Level 7 qualification, was reasonable and justified on the facts and law. The applicant's reliance on clause 8.4.2 of its Recruitment and Selection Policy was not documented in the recruitment process or appointment letter, and the evidence supported the respondents' contention that such conditions were generally recorded. The arbitrator's findings were supported by the transcript and uncontroverted evidence, and the applicant failed to demonstrate any gross irregularity or misconduct. The review application was accordingly dismissed.
Court Disposition
The review application is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The review application is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment