Georgious N.O and Others v Freyssenet Posten (Pty) Ltd and Another (5406/2014) [2015] ZAFSHC 147 (6 August 2015)
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to plead sufficient material facts to establish a contractual nexus between themselves and the excipient. The first plaintiff's claim for specific performance and rectification was unsustainable due to the absence of a contract directly binding the excipient to the first plaintiff, and the lack of necessary design information in the pleadings. The second plaintiff's claim for damages was excluded by the terms of the lease agreement and failed for lack of privity of contract with the excipient. The principle of incorporation by reference did not operate to create contractual obligations in the absence of clear reference and contractual linkage....
- Citation
- [2015] ZAFSHC 147
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Nicolas Georgiou N.O; Plaintiff: Goergiou Nicolas N.O.; Plaintiff: Joseph Reynolds Chemaly N.O; Plaintiff: Loch Logan Waterfront (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Freyssenet Posten (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Murray & Roberts Construction (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 August 2015
- Case Number
- 5406/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure / Exception to Particulars of Claim; Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Exception to both claims upheld; particulars of claim set aside with leave to amend.
- Judges
- Ebrahim
- Legal Topics
- Exception to Pleading, Contractual Privity, Specific Performance, Damages for Breach of Contract, Implied Terms, Building Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicolas Georgiou N.O
Plaintiff
Goergiou Nicolas N.O.
Plaintiff
Joseph Reynolds Chemaly N.O
Plaintiff
Loch Logan Waterfront (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
Freyssenet Posten (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Murray & Roberts Construction (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure / Exception to Particulars of Claim; Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the particulars of claim disclose a cause of action against the excipient for breach of contract.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient contractual nexus between themselves and the excipient.
- 3 Whether the claims for specific performance and damages are sustainable in law given the absence of privity of contract.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to plead sufficient material facts to establish a contractual nexus between themselves and the excipient. The first plaintiff's claim for specific performance and rectification was unsustainable due to the absence of a contract directly binding the excipient to the first plaintiff, and the lack of necessary design information in the pleadings. The second plaintiff's claim for damages was excluded by the terms of the lease agreement and failed for lack of privity of contract with the excipient. The principle of incorporation by reference did not operate to create contractual obligations in the absence of clear reference and contractual linkage....
Court Disposition
Exception to both claims upheld; particulars of claim set aside with leave to amend.
Orders
- The exception to both claims is upheld and the particulars of claim are set aside.
- Exceptions not pursued before the court are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment