Gerber v Road Accident Fund (28437/2012) [2015] ZAGPPHC 857 (17 November 2015)
The court found that the insured driver was negligent in executing a right turn across the plaintiff's path without signalling or reducing speed, and had already paid an admission of guilt fine for reckless and negligent driving. The plaintiff had the right of way and was entitled to expect reasonable conduct from other road users. There was no evidence that the plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout or could have avoided the collision by exercising reasonable care. The defendant did not present any witnesses or alternative version. The court held that the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent and is entitled to 100% of his proven damages.
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 857
- Parties
- Plaintiff: L Gerber; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2015
- Case Number
- 28437/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Merits and Apportionment of Damages
- Outcome
- Plaintiff succeeds in full; defendant ordered to pay 100% of proven damages and costs.
- Judges
- Motepe
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Reckless Driving
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L Gerber
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits and Apportionment of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent in the motor vehicle accident.
- 2 Whether damages should be apportioned due to alleged failure by the plaintiff to keep a proper lookout and avoid the collision.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the insured driver was negligent in executing a right turn across the plaintiff's path without signalling or reducing speed, and had already paid an admission of guilt fine for reckless and negligent driving. The plaintiff had the right of way and was entitled to expect reasonable conduct from other road users. There was no evidence that the plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout or could have avoided the collision by exercising reasonable care. The defendant did not present any witnesses or alternative version. The court held that the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent and is entitled to 100% of his proven damages.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff succeeds in full; defendant ordered to pay 100% of proven damages and costs.
Orders
- The defendant is ordered to pay 100% of the plaintiff's agreed or proven damages.
- The defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff delictual damages in the amount of R660,000.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment