Gerhardi v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd (NCT/22545/2015/137(3)(P)NCA) [2015] ZANCT 30 (11 December 2015)

Gerhardi v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd (NCT/22545/2015/137(3)(P)NCA) [2015] ZANCT 30 (11 December 2015)

The Tribunal found that both parties had been properly notified of the hearing date, time, and venue, as evidenced by their email acknowledgments of receipt of the set down notice. In accordance with Rule 24 of the National Consumer Tribunal Regulations, the presiding member was satisfied that the requirements for notification were met. As neither the applicant nor the respondent appeared or were represented at the hearing, the application was dismissed in terms of Rule 24(1)(a).

Citation
[2015] ZANCT 30
Parties
Applicant: AG Gerhardi; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd
Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
11 December 2015
Case Number
NCT/22545/2015/137(3)(P)NCA
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Dismissal for Non Appearance
Outcome
Application dismissed for non-appearance of both parties.
Judges
H Devraj
Legal Topics
National Credit Act, Alternative Dispute Resolution Failure, Dismissal for Non Appearance
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure National Credit Act Alternative Dispute Resolution Failure Dismissal for Non Appearance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AG Gerhardi

Applicant

Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Dismissal for Non Appearance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application should be dismissed due to non-appearance of both parties.
  2. 2 Whether the parties were properly notified of the hearing date, time, and venue.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that both parties had been properly notified of the hearing date, time, and venue, as evidenced by their email acknowledgments of receipt of the set down notice. In accordance with Rule 24 of the National Consumer Tribunal Regulations, the presiding member was satisfied that the requirements for notification were met. As neither the applicant nor the respondent appeared or were represented at the hearing, the application was dismissed in terms of Rule 24(1)(a).

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for non-appearance of both parties.

Orders

  • The application lodged in terms of Section 137(3) of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 is hereby dismissed.