Govan Mbeki Local Municipality and Another v Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (334/2021;338/2021) [2022] ZASCA 93; [2022] 3 All SA 675 (SCA); 2022 (6) SA 106 (SCA) (17 June 2022)

Govan Mbeki Local Municipality and Another v Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (334/2021;338/2021) [2022] ZASCA 93; [2022] 3 All SA 675 (SCA); 2022 (6) SA 106 (SCA) (17 June 2022)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the impugned municipal by-laws, which imposed an embargo on the registration of transfer of immovable property unless certain municipal requirements were met, exceeded the legislative competence of municipalities under s 156 of the Constitution. The by-laws regulated the transfer and registration of property, a function reserved for national government and governed by the Deeds Registries Act and national legislation. The court found that the by-laws were not authorised by the SPLUMA or the Systems Act, and that they conflicted with s 118 of the Systems Act by imposing additional liabilities on sellers. The by-laws also amounted to an arbitrary...

Citation
[2022] ZASCA 93
Parties
Appellant: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality; Appellant: Emalahleni Local Municipality; Respondent: Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Duiker Mining (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tavistock Collieries (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Umcebo Properties (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Izimbiwa Coal (Pty) Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 June 2022
Case Number
334/2021;338/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Mpumalanga Division of the High Court, Middelburg
Outcome
Appeals dismissed with costs; cross-appeal upheld with costs; suspension of declaration of invalidity set aside.
Judges
Maya, Dambuza, Plasket, Musi, Salie-Hlophe
Legal Topics
Municipal Legislative Competence, Arbitrary Deprivation of Property, Spatial Planning and Land Use Management, By Law Validity, Conflict With National Legislation, Deeds Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Govan Mbeki Local Municipality

Appellant

Emalahleni Local Municipality

Appellant

Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Duiker Mining (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Tavistock Collieries (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Umcebo Properties (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Izimbiwa Coal (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Mpumalanga Division of the High Court, Middelburg

  1. 1 Whether the impugned municipal by-laws regulating the transfer of property fall within the legislative competence of municipalities under s 156 of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the by-laws amount to an arbitrary deprivation of property in terms of s 25(1) of the Constitution.
  3. 3 Whether the by-laws conflict with national legislation, specifically the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act and the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the impugned municipal by-laws, which imposed an embargo on the registration of transfer of immovable property unless certain municipal requirements were met, exceeded the legislative competence of municipalities under s 156 of the Constitution. The by-laws regulated the transfer and registration of property, a function reserved for national government and governed by the Deeds Registries Act and national legislation. The court found that the by-laws were not authorised by the SPLUMA or the Systems Act, and that they conflicted with s 118 of the Systems Act by imposing additional liabilities on sellers. The by-laws also amounted to an arbitrary...

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed with costs; cross-appeal upheld with costs; suspension of declaration of invalidity set aside.

Orders

  • The appeal in case no 334/2021 (Govan Mbeki Local Municipality) is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
  • The cross-appeal in case no 334/2021 is upheld with costs, including the costs of two counsel.