Govan Mbeki Local Municipality and Another v Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (334/2021;338/2021) [2022] ZASCA 93; [2022] 3 All SA 675 (SCA); 2022 (6) SA 106 (SCA) (17 June 2022)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the impugned municipal by-laws, which imposed an embargo on the registration of transfer of immovable property unless certain municipal requirements were met, exceeded the legislative competence of municipalities under s 156 of the Constitution. The by-laws regulated the transfer and registration of property, a function reserved for national government and governed by the Deeds Registries Act and national legislation. The court found that the by-laws were not authorised by the SPLUMA or the Systems Act, and that they conflicted with s 118 of the Systems Act by imposing additional liabilities on sellers. The by-laws also amounted to an arbitrary...
- Citation
- [2022] ZASCA 93
- Parties
- Appellant: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality; Appellant: Emalahleni Local Municipality; Respondent: Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Duiker Mining (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tavistock Collieries (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Umcebo Properties (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Izimbiwa Coal (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2022
- Case Number
- 334/2021;338/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Mpumalanga Division of the High Court, Middelburg
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed with costs; cross-appeal upheld with costs; suspension of declaration of invalidity set aside.
- Judges
- Maya, Dambuza, Plasket, Musi, Salie-Hlophe
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Legislative Competence, Arbitrary Deprivation of Property, Spatial Planning and Land Use Management, By Law Validity, Conflict With National Legislation, Deeds Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Govan Mbeki Local Municipality
Appellant
Emalahleni Local Municipality
Appellant
Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Duiker Mining (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Tavistock Collieries (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Umcebo Properties (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Izimbiwa Coal (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Mpumalanga Division of the High Court, Middelburg
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the impugned municipal by-laws regulating the transfer of property fall within the legislative competence of municipalities under s 156 of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the by-laws amount to an arbitrary deprivation of property in terms of s 25(1) of the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the by-laws conflict with national legislation, specifically the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act and the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the impugned municipal by-laws, which imposed an embargo on the registration of transfer of immovable property unless certain municipal requirements were met, exceeded the legislative competence of municipalities under s 156 of the Constitution. The by-laws regulated the transfer and registration of property, a function reserved for national government and governed by the Deeds Registries Act and national legislation. The court found that the by-laws were not authorised by the SPLUMA or the Systems Act, and that they conflicted with s 118 of the Systems Act by imposing additional liabilities on sellers. The by-laws also amounted to an arbitrary...
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed with costs; cross-appeal upheld with costs; suspension of declaration of invalidity set aside.
Orders
- The appeal in case no 334/2021 (Govan Mbeki Local Municipality) is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
- The cross-appeal in case no 334/2021 is upheld with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment