Govender and Another v Vermeulen Trading as Advance Pool and Spa and Others (NCT/107447/2018f75(1)(b)) [2019] ZANCT 74 (17 May 2019)
The Tribunal found that the Respondents supplied and installed a defective swimming pool, evidenced by persistent defects and poor workmanship, which breached the material terms of the contract and the standards required by the Consumer Protection Act. The Applicants were justified in cancelling the contract and seeking a refund. The Tribunal held that the Respondents are jointly and severally liable to refund the Applicants for the defective goods, remove the defective pool, and restore the Applicants' property. The Tribunal's powers are limited by statute and do not extend to awarding damages for wasted water or expert costs. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondents engaged in...
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCT 74
- Parties
- Applicant: Gavinthren Govender; Applicant: Leah Joan Govender; Respondent: Gerhard Vermeulen trading as Advance Pool and Spa; Respondent: Advance Pools CC; Respondent: Advance Pools Gauteng trading as Advance Pools; Respondent: Amelda Vermeulen
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2019
- Case Number
- NCT/107447/2018f75(1)(b)
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Merits Hearing After Leave Granted
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondents found liable for prohibited conduct and ordered to refund Applicants, remove defective goods, and restore property.
- Judges
- M Nkomo, T Woker, H Devraj
- Legal Topics
- Consumer Protection Act, Defective Goods, Specific Performance, Refund of Purchase Price, Joint and Several Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gavinthren Govender
Applicant
Leah Joan Govender
Applicant
Gerhard Vermeulen trading as Advance Pool and Spa
Respondent
Advance Pools CC
Respondent
Advance Pools Gauteng trading as Advance Pools
Respondent
Amelda Vermeulen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Merits Hearing After Leave Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents supplied and installed a defective swimming pool in breach of the Consumer Protection Act.
- 2 Whether the Applicants are entitled to a refund for the defective goods and related services.
- 3 Whether the Respondents are liable to remove the defective goods and restore the Applicants' property.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondents supplied and installed a defective swimming pool, evidenced by persistent defects and poor workmanship, which breached the material terms of the contract and the standards required by the Consumer Protection Act. The Applicants were justified in cancelling the contract and seeking a refund. The Tribunal held that the Respondents are jointly and severally liable to refund the Applicants for the defective goods, remove the defective pool, and restore the Applicants' property. The Tribunal's powers are limited by statute and do not extend to awarding damages for wasted water or expert costs. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondents engaged in...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondents found liable for prohibited conduct and ordered to refund Applicants, remove defective goods, and restore property.
Orders
- The Respondents have engaged in prohibited conduct.
- The first to fourth Respondents are jointly and severally liable for the defective goods provided to the Applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment