Government Employees Pension Fund and Compensation Fund Duly Represented by Public Investment Corporation Soc Limited v La Crushers Proprietary Limited (LM219Feb17) [2017] ZACT 21; [2017] 1 CPLR 285 (CT) (2 June 2017)

Government Employees Pension Fund and Compensation Fund Duly Represented by Public Investment Corporation Soc Limited v La Crushers Proprietary Limited (LM219Feb17) [2017] ZACT 21; [2017] 1 CPLR 285 (CT) (2 June 2017)

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction, whereby the PIC would acquire controlling shares in LA Crushers on behalf of the GEPF and CF, does not result in any overlap in the relevant market, as the PIC does not control firms involved in load and haul materials handling services. The Competition Commission's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] ZACT 21
Parties
Applicant: Government Employees Pension Fund; Applicant: Compensation Fund duly represented by Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited; Respondent: LA Crushers Proprietary Limited
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
LM219Feb17
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Transaction
Outcome
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Judges
Andiswa Ndoni, Medi Mokuena, Fiona Tregenna
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Public Interest, Market Definition
Competition Law Merger Control Public Interest Market Definition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Government Employees Pension Fund

Applicant

Compensation Fund duly represented by Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited

Applicant

LA Crushers Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Transaction

  1. 1 Whether the proposed acquisition of controlling shares in LA Crushers by the PIC on behalf of GEPF and CF is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market in South Africa.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed transaction raises any public interest concerns, including adverse effects on employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction, whereby the PIC would acquire controlling shares in LA Crushers on behalf of the GEPF and CF, does not result in any overlap in the relevant market, as the PIC does not control firms involved in load and haul materials handling services. The Competition Commission's investigation confirmed that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market in South Africa. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that the transaction would not have an adverse effect on employment or raise any other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Court Disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction is approved without conditions.