Government Employees Pension Fund v InvestCo (Pty) Ltd (LM027May21) [2021] ZACT 93 (3 August 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] ZACT 93
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Enver Daniels, Imraan Valodia, Thando Vilakazi
- Case number
- LM027May21
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Enver Daniels, Imraan Valodia, Thando Vilakazi
- Case number
- LM027May21
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The only horizontal overlap identified was between Just Veggies and Harvest Fresh, which operate in different provinces and have limited market interaction. The GEPF's internal policies prohibit cross-directorships and the sharing of competitively sensitive information, adequately addressing the Commission's concerns. No public interest issues, including employment impacts, were raised. The Tribunal concluded that the merger posed no competition or public interest risks and approved it unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The large merger between the Government Employees Pension Fund and InvestCo (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Government Employees Pension Fund
Applicant Counsel: N Hlatshwayo and P Mashalane of Lawtons AfricaInvestCo (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- GEPF Shareholding in Invest Co Post Merger: ZAR 35
- Thebe Shareholding in Invest Co Post Merger: ZAR 65
03
Procedural history
Posture
Large Merger / Merger Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the merger raises public interest concerns, including employment impacts.
- 03
Whether cross-directorships and information sharing between competitors are adequately mitigated.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Government Employees Pension Fund, represented by the PIC, argued that the acquisition of a 35% shareholding in InvestCo would not result in any anti-competitive effects. They submitted that the merger would not lead to job losses or negatively impact employment. The parties highlighted the existence of internal policies prohibiting cross-directorships and the sharing of confidential information between investee companies operating in the same sector.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission contended that the only horizontal overlap was between Just Veggies and Harvest Fresh in the supply of value-added and pre-packed fresh produce. The Commission found that the vertical relationships were unlikely to have negative effects, given the GEPF's lack of control over related firms. It also noted that the GEPF's internal policies provided adequate safeguards against information sharing and that the merger would not alter market structure or raise public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998
A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, unless there are efficiency or public interest justifications.
- 02
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998
Joint control arises where a shareholder can veto strategic decisions, as contemplated by section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act.
- 03
Competition Commission Merger Guidelines
Internal policies prohibiting cross-directorships and information sharing between competitors are sufficient safeguards to mitigate anti-competitive risks.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The only horizontal overlap identified was between Just Veggies and Harvest Fresh, which operate in different provinces and have limited market interaction. The GEPF's internal policies prohibit cross-directorships and the sharing of competitively sensitive information, adequately addressing the Commission's concerns. No public interest issues, including employment impacts, were raised. The Tribunal concluded that the merger posed no competition or public interest risks and approved it unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the GEPF's internal governance structures serve as a model for mitigating information sharing risks in complex investment portfolios.
- The Commission's initial concerns regarding cross-directorships were satisfactorily addressed by the merging parties' policies.
- The merger approval process demonstrates the importance of sector-specific safeguards in large mergers involving institutional investors.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
- The large merger between the Government Employees Pension Fund and InvestCo (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: LM027May21
The Government Employees Pension Fund (Primary Acquiring Firm)
and
InvestCo (Pty) Ltd (Primary
Target Firm)
REASONS
FOR DECISION
[1] On 3 August 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between The Government Employees Pension Fund (the GEPF ) represented by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited (the “PIC”) , and InvestCo (Pty) Ltd (“InvestCo”).
[2] The transaction involves a restructuring through which Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd (“Thebe”) will transfer its food agro-processing and services[1] portfolio (the food, agro and services business”) to InvestCo[2] The GEPF will acquire 35% of the shares in InvestCo. Post-merger, the GEPF will acquire joint control of InvestCo.[3]
[3] The GEPF is a pension fund that manages and administers pensions and other benefits for government employees in South Africa. It is not controlled by any firm. The PIC, on behalf of the GEPF, invests in various classes of assets including equities, property and fixed income. The GEPF holds various non-controlling interests in firms that are active in the food, agro and services sector.[4] Of relevance is GEPF’s 50% controlling interest in Just Veggies Equity (Pty) Ltd (“Just Veggies”). [5]
[4] Thebe controls several firms. InvestCo is Thebe’s wholly owned special purpose vehicle created for the purposes of the proposed transaction. InvestCo controls several firms that are active in the food, agro and services sector. Of relevance is InvestCo’s [….] controlling interest in Harvest Fresh Farms (Pty) Ltd (“Harvest Fresh”).[6]
[5] The Competition Commission found that although the merging parties are broadly active in the food, agro and services sector in South Africa, the only horizontal overlap arising from this transaction is in respect of Just Veggies and Harvest Fresh, in the supply of value added and pre-packed fresh produce in the vegetable farming and processing sector.[7] The Commission found that the pre-existing vertical relationships were unlikely to have any negative effects as the GEPF does not
control any of the firms which have a business relationship with InvestCo.
[6] The Commission found that Harvest Fresh operates in the Gauteng and Free State Provinces whereas Just Veggies operates in the KwaZulu-Natal Province. The Commission also found that although the GEPF controls Just Veggies, given Just Veggies financial difficulties and its limited operations (as confirmed by a major customer), the merger is unlikely to significantly alter the structure of the market wherein Just Veggies and Harvest Fresh operate.
[7] The Commission was initially concerned that if the GEPF could appoint directors in the firms that it held both controlling and non-controlling interests in the food, agro and services business sector, that these structural links could allow for the sharing of competitively sensitive information[8] among competitors. The merging parties through monitoring and controls within the PIC, prohibits the flow of one investee company’s
confidential information, confidential information and investee information.
[8] The Commission analysed the Policy and found that it prohibits the appointment of an employee or non-executive director to the board of directors of more than one investee company operating within the same industry sector. In other words, a representative of the GEPF may not sit on the boards of two or more companies that are direct competitors of one another. The Commission found that the Policy offers adequate safeguards to mitigate any information sharing concerns arising from the cross- directorships resulting from this merger.
[9] The employee representative of Thebe confirmed that notified of the proposed transaction and that no employment concerns were received. The merging parties additionally submitted unequivocally that the proposed transaction would not result in any job losses or have an impact on employment.[9]
[10] The Commission was therefore of the view that the proposed transaction was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen
competition, and did not raise any public interest concerns.
[11] We concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on the public interest.
Date: 03 August 2021
Mr Enver Daniels
Prof Imraan Valodia and Dr Thando Vilakazi concurring
Tribunal Case Manager: P Kumbirai
For the Merging Parties: N Hlatshwayo and P Mashalane of Lawtons Africa
For the Commission: P Bele and W Gumbie
[1] Food catering; fresh produce growing, packaging, marketing and distributing; cleaning; hygiene; facilities management; corporate
real estate services and other related services.
[2] Thebe will thereafter dispose of its shares in the food, agro and services business to InvestCo, in exchange for InvestCo issuing 65% of its shares to Thebe.
[3] The Commission found that GEPF 35% shareholding entitles them to veto strategic decisions as contemplated by section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998. InvestCo will be jointly controlled by the GEPF and Thebe.
[4] A relevant example being -controlling interest in Bidvest Group Limited cleaning, hygiene, and catering services.
[5] A local agricultural enterprise based in KwaZulu Natal, which provides quality fresh and frozen vegetables to the local market.
[6] A farming enterprise for growing, packing and distributing ready to eat salad blends, baby leaf salads, fresh-cut vegetables and herbs.
[7] The Commission found that the other non-controlling interests held by the GEPF in the food, agro and services sector did not raise any competition concerns as the GEPF did not control them.
[8] Information such as pricing and marketing strategies.
[9] The Commission was unable numerous attempts.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.