Government of the Province of Northern Transvaal and Another v Rand Mines Ltd. (201/95) [1998] ZASCA 33 (15 May 1998)

Government of the Province of Northern Transvaal and Another v Rand Mines Ltd. (201/95) [1998] ZASCA 33 (15 May 1998)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the reservations of rights to minerals in the certificates, specifically regarding granite and marble suitable for use as dimension stone, were clear and unambiguous. The Court found that the respondent was entitled to the reserved rights as stated in the certificates. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] ZASCA 33
Parties
Appellant: Government of the Province of Northern Transvaal; Appellant: Lebowa Mineral Trust; Respondent: Rand Mines Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
201/95
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Transvaal Provincial Division
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
Judges
Smalberger, Zulman, Streicher, Melunsky, Farlam
Legal Topics
Mineral Rights Reservation, Interpretation of Certificates, Dimension Stone Rights
Land and Property Mineral Rights Reservation Interpretation of Certificates Dimension Stone Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Government of the Province of Northern Transvaal

Appellant

Lebowa Mineral Trust

Appellant

Rand Mines Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Transvaal Provincial Division

  1. 1 Whether the rights to granite and marble suitable for use as dimension stone were reserved in favour of the respondent in the certificates of rights to minerals for the specified farms.
  2. 2 Whether the reservation wording in the certificates confers exclusive rights to the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the reservations of rights to minerals in the certificates, specifically regarding granite and marble suitable for use as dimension stone, were clear and unambiguous. The Court found that the respondent was entitled to the reserved rights as stated in the certificates. The appeal was dismissed for the reasons set out in the simultaneously handed down judgment in Minister of Land Affairs v Rand Mines Ltd, which dealt with identical wording and issues.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The appellants are ordered to pay the costs of the appeal, including the costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.