Green v Road Accident Fund (6621A/2009) [2010] ZAGPPHC 288 (26 April 2010)

Green v Road Accident Fund (6621A/2009) [2010] ZAGPPHC 288 (26 April 2010)

The court accepted the expert evidence and actuarial calculations as agreed by the parties. The plaintiff suffered physical and psychological injuries resulting in a minor but significant loss of work capacity and loss of promotion prospects. The court found the injuries less severe than those in Daniels and Jacobs, awarding R100,000.00 for general damages. Past medical expenses of R7,847.40 were proven and awarded. For future loss of earnings, the court applied a 15% contingency deduction, resulting in R395,181.90. The total award is R503,029.30. The defendant is ordered to furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses under section 17(4)(a) of Act 56 of 1996. Costs are awarded to...

Citation
[2010] ZAGPPHC 288
Parties
Plaintiff: Carolyn Margaret Green; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 April 2010
Case Number
6621A/2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld. Defendant ordered to pay damages, furnish undertaking for future medical expenses, and pay costs.
Judges
Botha
Legal Topics
Road Accident Claim, General Damages, Future Medical Expenses, Loss of Earnings, Contingency Deduction
Delict Civil Procedure Road Accident Claim General Damages Future Medical Expenses Loss of Earnings Contingency Deduction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carolyn Margaret Green

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the plaintiff's injuries sustained in the motor vehicle collision.
  2. 2 Is the plaintiff entitled to compensation for past and future medical expenses, general damages, and loss of earnings.
  3. 3 Should the defendant furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses under section 17(4)(a) of Act 56 of 1996.

Ratio Decidendi

The court accepted the expert evidence and actuarial calculations as agreed by the parties. The plaintiff suffered physical and psychological injuries resulting in a minor but significant loss of work capacity and loss of promotion prospects. The court found the injuries less severe than those in Daniels and Jacobs, awarding R100,000.00 for general damages. Past medical expenses of R7,847.40 were proven and awarded. For future loss of earnings, the court applied a 15% contingency deduction, resulting in R395,181.90. The total award is R503,029.30. The defendant is ordered to furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses under section 17(4)(a) of Act 56 of 1996. Costs are awarded to...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld. Defendant ordered to pay damages, furnish undertaking for future medical expenses, and pay costs.

Orders

  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff R503,029.30 as damages by 28 May 2010.
  • The amount of R503,029.30 will not bear interest before 28 May 2010; thereafter, interest at 15.5% per annum until payment.