Greenan (estate Ebbelaar) and Another v Commissioner for Inland Revenue, Greenan (estate Terblanche) and Another v Commissioner for Inland Revenue (537/94, 538/94) [1996] ZASCA 53 (24 May 1996)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 19 of the Estate Duty Act imposes personal liability on an executor only for estate duty payable in respect of specific property distributed in contravention of section 18. The phrase 'in respect thereof' restricts liability to duty attributable to the property actually transferred, not to the value of the property or to duty attributable to assets never under the executor's control. Since the proceeds of the Sanlam policy were paid directly to Nedbank and never formed part of the estate assets administered by the executor, the executor could not be personally liable for the estate duty attributable to those proceeds. The respondent's...
- Citation
- [1996] ZASCA 53
- Parties
- Appellant: HA Greenan (estate Ebbelaar); Appellant: ABSA Trust Limited; Respondent: Commissioner for Inland Revenue; Appellant: HA Greenan (estate Terblanche)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 1996
- Case Number
- 537/94, 538/94
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Witwatersrand Local Division; Motion Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeals upheld; cross-appeals dismissed.
- Judges
- Van Heerden, Hefer, Harms, Scott, Zulman
- Legal Topics
- Estate Duty, Executor Liability, Distribution of Estate Assets, Personal Liability of Executor
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HA Greenan (estate Ebbelaar)
Appellant
ABSA Trust Limited
Appellant
Commissioner for Inland Revenue
Respondent
HA Greenan (estate Terblanche)
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Witwatersrand Local Division; Motion Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an executor who distributes estate assets without paying estate duty attributable to policy proceeds is personally liable under section 19 of the Estate Duty Act.
- 2 Whether section 19 of the Estate Duty Act imposes personal liability on the executor for duty in respect of property never in his possession or control.
- 3 Interpretation of the phrase 'in respect thereof' in section 19 of the Estate Duty Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 19 of the Estate Duty Act imposes personal liability on an executor only for estate duty payable in respect of specific property distributed in contravention of section 18. The phrase 'in respect thereof' restricts liability to duty attributable to the property actually transferred, not to the value of the property or to duty attributable to assets never under the executor's control. Since the proceeds of the Sanlam policy were paid directly to Nedbank and never formed part of the estate assets administered by the executor, the executor could not be personally liable for the estate duty attributable to those proceeds. The respondent's...
Court Disposition
Appeals upheld; cross-appeals dismissed.
Orders
- It is declared that neither of the applicants is liable personally to pay to the respondent the sum claimed by the respondent in respect of estate duty payable by the estate of the deceased.
- The respondent is interdicted from entering judgment against the applicants for payment of the said estate duty in terms of section 25 of the Estate Duty Act 45 of 1955.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment