Greyling and Another v Nkosi and Others (LCC 71/2022 B) [2022] ZALCC 17 (9 June 2022)
The Land Claims Court has jurisdiction to grant an exhumation order as the matter is incidental to burial rights under ESTA and falls within the court's powers under section 22(2)(c) of the Restitution of Land Rights Act. The relevant regulation does not oust this jurisdiction, as subordinate legislation cannot limit the powers of the High Court or the Land Claims Court. The burial of the deceased on the applicant's farm was unlawful, having been conducted in direct defiance of a court order and without meeting the statutory requirement of residence. Urgency was established due to the ongoing decomposition of the body and the need to prevent a sense of permanency. The respondents' conduct...
- Citation
- [2022] ZALCC 17
- Parties
- Applicant: Barend Petrus Greyling; Applicant: Barend Petrus Greyling N.O; Respondent: Busisiwe Gloria Nkosi; Respondent: Nkosingiphile Grace Nkosi; Respondent: Dr. Pixley ka Isaka Seme Local Municipality; Respondent: Gert Sibande District Municipality; Respondent: The Provincial Commissioner South African Police Services; Respondent: MEC, Mpumalanga Department of Health
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2022
- Case Number
- LCC 71/2022 B
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. Exhumation of the deceased ordered. Costs awarded against the first and second respondents.
- Judges
- Y S Meer
- Legal Topics
- Exhumation Order, Burial Rights, Contempt of Court, Jurisdiction of High Court, Extension of Security of Tenure Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barend Petrus Greyling
Applicant
Barend Petrus Greyling N.O
Applicant
Busisiwe Gloria Nkosi
Respondent
Nkosingiphile Grace Nkosi
Respondent
Dr. Pixley ka Isaka Seme Local Municipality
Respondent
Gert Sibande District Municipality
Respondent
The Provincial Commissioner South African Police Services
Respondent
MEC, Mpumalanga Department of Health
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Claims Court has jurisdiction to grant an exhumation order under the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the burial of the deceased on the applicant's farm was lawful given the previous court order and statutory requirements.
- 3 Whether urgency is established for the exhumation application.
Ratio Decidendi
The Land Claims Court has jurisdiction to grant an exhumation order as the matter is incidental to burial rights under ESTA and falls within the court's powers under section 22(2)(c) of the Restitution of Land Rights Act. The relevant regulation does not oust this jurisdiction, as subordinate legislation cannot limit the powers of the High Court or the Land Claims Court. The burial of the deceased on the applicant's farm was unlawful, having been conducted in direct defiance of a court order and without meeting the statutory requirement of residence. Urgency was established due to the ongoing decomposition of the body and the need to prevent a sense of permanency. The respondents' conduct...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Exhumation of the deceased ordered. Costs awarded against the first and second respondents.
Orders
- The exhumation of the deceased, Richard Bonginkosi Mabasa, from the Remaining Extent of Farm Buitenzorg 114 HT, Mpumalanga, for reburial at Esizameleni Graveyard, Wakkerstroom, is ordered, subject to compliance with Regulation 26 of the Regulations relating to the Management of Human Remains under the National...
- The Third and/or Fourth and/or Sixth Respondents are ordered to issue a reburial permit for the deceased at Esizameleni Graveyard, Wakkerstroom.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment