Grootboom v National Prosecuting Authority and Another (CCT 08/13) [2013] ZACC 37; 2014 (2) SA 68 (CC); 2014 (1) BCLR 65 (CC); [2014] 1 BLLR 1 (CC); (2014) 35 ILJ 121 (CC) (21 October 2013)
The Constitutional Court held that the applicant, having been placed on precautionary suspension with explicit instructions not to attend the workplace or perform any duties, was absent from work with the employer's permission. Therefore, the essential requirement of section 17(5)(a)(i) of the Public Service Act—that the absence be without permission—was not met. The applicant's departure to the United Kingdom for study did not alter his status as a suspended employee, and there was no evidence that he was recalled to duty and failed to respond. The Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court erred in finding that the applicant had absented himself without permission. The deemed discharge...
- Citation
- [2013] ZACC 37
- Parties
- Applicant: Derrick Grootboom; Respondent: National Prosecuting Authority; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2013
- Case Number
- CCT 08/13
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Constitutional Court After Refusal of Special Leave by the Supreme Court of Appeal, Following Judgments in the Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court.
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Orders of the Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court set aside. Applicant declared not to have absented himself from official duties without permission and continues to be employed by the National Prosecuting Authority. Respondents' applications for condonation dismissed. Costs awarded to applicant for...
- Judges
- Bosielo AJ, Moseneke J, Froneman J, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Mhlantla AJ, Nkabinde J, Skweyiya J, Zondo J
- Legal Topics
- Public Service Act, Fair Labour Practices, Condonation, Administrative Action, Suspension of Employees, Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Derrick Grootboom
Applicant
National Prosecuting Authority
Respondent
Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Constitutional Court After Refusal of Special Leave by the Supreme Court of Appeal, Following Judgments in the Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' delay in filing opposing papers and written submissions should be condoned.
- 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted.
- 3 Whether the jurisdictional requirements of section 17(5)(a)(i) of the Public Service Act were met.
Ratio Decidendi
The Constitutional Court held that the applicant, having been placed on precautionary suspension with explicit instructions not to attend the workplace or perform any duties, was absent from work with the employer's permission. Therefore, the essential requirement of section 17(5)(a)(i) of the Public Service Act—that the absence be without permission—was not met. The applicant's departure to the United Kingdom for study did not alter his status as a suspended employee, and there was no evidence that he was recalled to duty and failed to respond. The Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court erred in finding that the applicant had absented himself without permission. The deemed discharge...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Orders of the Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court set aside. Applicant declared not to have absented himself from official duties without permission and continues to be employed by the National Prosecuting Authority. Respondents' applications for condonation dismissed. Costs awarded to applicant for...
Orders
- The respondents' applications for condonation are dismissed.
- Leave to appeal is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment