Group Five Construction Pty Ltd v Fikeni A.O. (43891/2019) [2024] ZAGPJHC 448 (7 May 2024)
The applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success for leave to appeal. The final payment certificate in this matter expressly identified defects and did not certify completion of the works in accordance with the contract. Payment under the certificate is not due until the applicant remedies the defects as required by the contract. The applicant's argument that the certificate is conclusive and payment must be made regardless of defects is unsustainable, as the contract and established legal principles require defects to be remedied before payment. The assertion that the judgment would cause crisis in the construction industry is unfounded. The requirements for leave to...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 448
- Parties
- Applicant: Group Five Construction (Pty) Ltd. (In business Rescue); Respondent: Dr Somadoda Patrick Mayibongwe Fikeni A.O.
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2024
- Case Number
- 43891/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Claim at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Noko
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Construction Contracts, Payment Certificates, Final Completion, Contractual Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Group Five Construction (Pty) Ltd. (In business Rescue)
Applicant
Dr Somadoda Patrick Mayibongwe Fikeni A.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Claim at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated reasonable prospects of success for leave to appeal.
- 2 Whether the final payment certificate under the principal building agreement obliges the employer to pay despite identified defects.
- 3 Whether payment can be withheld pending rectification of defects identified in the final certificate.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success for leave to appeal. The final payment certificate in this matter expressly identified defects and did not certify completion of the works in accordance with the contract. Payment under the certificate is not due until the applicant remedies the defects as required by the contract. The applicant's argument that the certificate is conclusive and payment must be made regardless of defects is unsustainable, as the contract and established legal principles require defects to be remedied before payment. The assertion that the judgment would cause crisis in the construction industry is unfounded. The requirements for leave to...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment