Growthpoint Properties Limited v Africa Master Blockchain Company (PTY) Ltd (2020/43806) [2022] ZAGPJHC 836 (26 October 2022)
The court found that the defendant admitted its obligations under the lease agreement and its failure to pay the amounts claimed, except for a vague and unsupported dispute regarding four parking bays. The defendant failed to provide sufficient particularity or evidence regarding the alleged dispossession or the period affected. The lease agreement expressly excluded reliance on force majeure or impossibility of performance, barring the defendant from raising the Covid-19 pandemic as a defence. The defendant's purported cancellation of the lease was not effective, as it merely requested release from its obligations and subsequently sought rent relief. The technical defence based on Rule...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPJHC 836
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Growthpoint Properties Limited; Defendant: Africa Master Blockchain Company (PTY) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2022
- Case Number
- 2020/43806
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Opposed Summary Judgment Application; Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for arrear rental and utilities; claim for damages postponed sine dies.
- Judges
- Maier-Frawley
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Lease Agreement, Force Majeure, Arrear Rental, Remission of Rent, Certificate of Balance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Growthpoint Properties Limited
Plaintiff
Africa Master Blockchain Company (PTY) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Opposed Summary Judgment Application; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has raised a bona fide and sustainable defence to the plaintiff's claim for arrear rental and utilities.
- 2 Whether the defendant's alleged dispossession of parking bays constitutes a valid defence to payment of rental.
- 3 Whether the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and alleged impossibility of performance excuse the defendant from its obligations under the lease agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant admitted its obligations under the lease agreement and its failure to pay the amounts claimed, except for a vague and unsupported dispute regarding four parking bays. The defendant failed to provide sufficient particularity or evidence regarding the alleged dispossession or the period affected. The lease agreement expressly excluded reliance on force majeure or impossibility of performance, barring the defendant from raising the Covid-19 pandemic as a defence. The defendant's purported cancellation of the lease was not effective, as it merely requested release from its obligations and subsequently sought rent relief. The technical defence based on Rule...
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for arrear rental and utilities; claim for damages postponed sine dies.
Orders
- Payment of R453,649.64 in respect of rentals payable to the plaintiff.
- Payment of R67,405.91 in respect of utility charges, rates, taxes, and interest payable to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment