Growthpoint Properties Limited v JICAMA 51 Ltd t/a Rusty Grand Cafe (M132/2022) [2022] ZANWHC 53 (30 December 2022)
The court found that the pending litigation in the Magistrate’s Court relates to a different cause of action and subject matter, as the current application concerns the subsequent lease agreement of 12 March 2021, while the Magistrate’s Court action relates to the earlier lease and arrears. The point in limine of lis pendens was dismissed. The respondent’s argument of non-joinder of the Rustenburg Local Municipality failed, as the municipality has no direct interest in the relief sought and its involvement is unnecessary for electricity disconnection. On the merits, the respondent failed to comply with payment obligations under the subsequent lease, with R272,554.67 outstanding. The...
- Citation
- [2022] ZANWHC 53
- Parties
- Applicant: Growthpoint Properties Limited; Respondent: JICAMA 51 (PTY) LTD t/a Rusty Grand Café
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2022
- Case Number
- M132/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Order on Application for Eviction and Ancillary Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted. The subsequent lease agreement is cancelled, the respondent and persons claiming occupation under it are evicted, electricity supply may be terminated, and costs are awarded to the applicant.
- Judges
- J T Djaje
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Lease Cancellation, Improvement Lien, Lis Pendens, Non Joinder
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Growthpoint Properties Limited
Applicant
JICAMA 51 (PTY) LTD t/a Rusty Grand Café
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Order on Application for Eviction and Ancillary Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to confirmation of cancellation of the subsequent lease agreement entered into on 12 March 2021.
- 2 Whether the respondent and persons claiming occupation under it should be evicted from the property.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to terminate the respondent’s supply of electricity to the property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the pending litigation in the Magistrate’s Court relates to a different cause of action and subject matter, as the current application concerns the subsequent lease agreement of 12 March 2021, while the Magistrate’s Court action relates to the earlier lease and arrears. The point in limine of lis pendens was dismissed. The respondent’s argument of non-joinder of the Rustenburg Local Municipality failed, as the municipality has no direct interest in the relief sought and its involvement is unnecessary for electricity disconnection. On the merits, the respondent failed to comply with payment obligations under the subsequent lease, with R272,554.67 outstanding. The...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The subsequent lease agreement is cancelled, the respondent and persons claiming occupation under it are evicted, electricity supply may be terminated, and costs are awarded to the applicant.
Orders
- Confirmation of cancellation of the subsequent lease agreement entered into between the parties on 12 March 2021 is granted.
- The respondent and any person claiming occupation under it are evicted from Shop 22 Waterfall Mall Value Centre, Augrabies Avenue, Cashan Ext 12, Rustenburg.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment