Growthpoint Properties Ltd v Makhonya Technologies (Pty) Ltd and Others (67029/2011) [2013] ZAGPPHC 43 (12 February 2013)

Growthpoint Properties Ltd v Makhonya Technologies (Pty) Ltd and Others (67029/2011) [2013] ZAGPPHC 43 (12 February 2013)

The court held that its jurisdiction to make a settlement agreement an order of court is not dependent on the existence of pending proceedings or on provisions in the Rules. The High Court's inherent jurisdiction and section 19 of the Supreme Court Act, 1959, empower it to determine any existing right or obligation at the instance of an interested party. The settlement agreement resolved a prior dispute and confirmed an existing debt, and the parties expressly agreed that it could be made an order of court. The absence of litigation prior to the agreement does not preclude the court from granting the order, as requiring prior proceedings would lead to unnecessary duplication and costs....

Citation
[2013] ZAGPPHC 43
Parties
Applicant: Growthpoint Properties Limited; Respondent: Makhonya Technologies (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Michael Tarubing Dzimbanete; Respondent: Venessa Nancy Abrahams
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 February 2013
Case Number
67029/2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Make Settlement Agreement an Order of Court
Outcome
Application granted; settlement agreement made an order of court; respondents ordered to pay costs.
Judges
Van der Byl
Legal Topics
Settlement Agreement, Enforcement of Debt, Inherent Jurisdiction, Confirmation of Existing Debt
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Settlement Agreement Enforcement of Debt Inherent Jurisdiction Confirmation of Existing Debt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Growthpoint Properties Limited

Applicant

Makhonya Technologies (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Michael Tarubing Dzimbanete

Respondent

Venessa Nancy Abrahams

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Make Settlement Agreement an Order of Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to make a settlement agreement an order of court where no prior proceedings were instituted.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of pending litigation precludes the court from granting the order sought.
  3. 3 Whether the settlement agreement constitutes a novation or merely confirms an existing debt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that its jurisdiction to make a settlement agreement an order of court is not dependent on the existence of pending proceedings or on provisions in the Rules. The High Court's inherent jurisdiction and section 19 of the Supreme Court Act, 1959, empower it to determine any existing right or obligation at the instance of an interested party. The settlement agreement resolved a prior dispute and confirmed an existing debt, and the parties expressly agreed that it could be made an order of court. The absence of litigation prior to the agreement does not preclude the court from granting the order, as requiring prior proceedings would lead to unnecessary duplication and costs....

Court Disposition

Application granted; settlement agreement made an order of court; respondents ordered to pay costs.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement concluded between the applicant and the first, second, and third respondents (Annexure D to the founding affidavit) is made an order of court.
  • The respondents are ordered to pay the applicant's costs.