Growthpoint Properties Ltd and Metboard Properties Ltd (24/LM/Mar06) [2006] ZACT 52 (14 June 2006)

Growthpoint Properties Ltd and Metboard Properties Ltd (24/LM/Mar06) [2006] ZACT 52 (14 June 2006)

The Tribunal found that both Growthpoint and Metboard operate in the industrial property market, with overlap only in this segment. The Commission's analysis, based on market share data, showed that post-merger market shares in all relevant nodes remain low, with the highest being 17% in Pinetown. In most nodes, Growthpoint would acquire only one or two properties, and in several, its presence is minimal. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's conclusion that the merger is unlikely to raise any serious competition concerns in either the narrow or broad product markets. No public interest issues were identified. Accordingly, the merger does not result in a substantial lessening or...

Citation
[2006] ZACT 52
Parties
Applicant: Growthpoint Properties Ltd; Respondent: Metboard Properties Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 June 2006
Case Number
24/LM/Mar06
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Final Determination
Outcome
Merger approved unconditionally; no substantial lessening or prevention of competition found.
Judges
M Moerane, M Mokuena, U Bhoola
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Market Definition, Public Interest, Industrial Property Market
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Merger Control Market Definition Public Interest Industrial Property Market

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Growthpoint Properties Ltd

Applicant

Metboard Properties Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Application / Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger between Growthpoint Properties Ltd and Metboard Properties Ltd will substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant industrial property markets.
  2. 2 Whether any public interest concerns arise from the merger.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that both Growthpoint and Metboard operate in the industrial property market, with overlap only in this segment. The Commission's analysis, based on market share data, showed that post-merger market shares in all relevant nodes remain low, with the highest being 17% in Pinetown. In most nodes, Growthpoint would acquire only one or two properties, and in several, its presence is minimal. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's conclusion that the merger is unlikely to raise any serious competition concerns in either the narrow or broad product markets. No public interest issues were identified. Accordingly, the merger does not result in a substantial lessening or...

Court Disposition

Merger approved unconditionally; no substantial lessening or prevention of competition found.

Orders

  • The proposed merger between Growthpoint Properties Ltd and Metboard Properties Ltd is approved without conditions.
  • No public interest concerns arise from this transaction.