Gwadiso and Another v Member of the Executive Council: Department of Housing and Local Government and Traditional Affairs and Another (1003/2007) [2008] ZAECHC 181 (30 October 2008)
The court held that section 20(1)(c) of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Act 4 of 2005 clearly confers power on the Member of the Executive Council to remove a headman whose appointment or recognition is considered wrongful. The functus officio principle does not apply to the exercise of this statutory power. The applicants were afforded the opportunity to make representations before the decision to revoke the appointment was made, and their failure to avail themselves of this opportunity does not render the process unlawful. The argument that the matter should have been referred to the royal family for investigation is unfounded, as section 20(1)(c) is self-contained and does...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAECHC 181
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Gcinikhaya Gwadiso; Applicant: Lindela Gwadiso; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council: Department of Housing, Local Government and Traditional Affairs; Respondent: Mhlabunzima Nwantsu
- Court
- High Courts - Eastern Cape
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2008
- Case Number
- 1003/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Confirmation of Rule Nisi; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Petse ADJP
- Legal Topics
- Traditional Leadership and Governance Act, Removal of Traditional Leader, Statutory Interpretation, Functus Officio, Customary Law Appointment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Gcinikhaya Gwadiso
Applicant
Lindela Gwadiso
Applicant
Member of the Executive Council: Department of Housing, Local Government and Traditional Affairs
Respondent
Mhlabunzima Nwantsu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Confirmation of Rule Nisi; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Member of the Executive Council had statutory authority to revoke the appointment of the second applicant as headman of Mamolweni Administrative Area.
- 2 Whether the applicants were afforded a proper opportunity to make representations before the revocation decision.
- 3 Whether the functus officio principle precluded the first respondent from rescinding the appointment without judicial review.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 20(1)(c) of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Act 4 of 2005 clearly confers power on the Member of the Executive Council to remove a headman whose appointment or recognition is considered wrongful. The functus officio principle does not apply to the exercise of this statutory power. The applicants were afforded the opportunity to make representations before the decision to revoke the appointment was made, and their failure to avail themselves of this opportunity does not render the process unlawful. The argument that the matter should have been referred to the royal family for investigation is unfounded, as section 20(1)(c) is self-contained and does...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment