GWK Prop (Edms) Bpk v Salut La Vie (Edms) Bpk (2094/2010) [2010] ZANCHC 16 (21 May 2010)

GWK Prop (Edms) Bpk v Salut La Vie (Edms) Bpk (2094/2010) [2010] ZANCHC 16 (21 May 2010)

The court found that the plaintiff's founding affidavit met the requirements of personal knowledge, as the deponent was the manager at the relevant time and location and explicitly stated such knowledge under oath. The defendant's attacks on the affidavit and particulars of claim were unfounded, relying on general denials and procedural technicalities rather than substantive facts. The defendant failed to set out a bona fide defence or material facts disputing the existence of the oral mandate agreement. The clause in the sale agreement between the defendant and the purchaser did not assist the defendant, as the plaintiff was not a party to that contract. The defendant's arguments...

Citation
[2010] ZANCHC 16
Parties
Plaintiff: GWK Properties (Edms) Bpk; Defendant: Salut La Vie (Edms) Bpk
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 May 2010
Case Number
2094/2010
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Judges
Olivier R
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Commission Claim, Oral Agency Agreement, Personal Knowledge Requirement, Pleading Requirements, Real Estate Transaction
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Land and Property Summary Judgment Commission Claim Oral Agency Agreement Personal Knowledge Requirement Pleading Requirements +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GWK Properties (Edms) Bpk

Plaintiff

Salut La Vie (Edms) Bpk

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Hearing and Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for commission on the sale of immovable property.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has raised a bona fide defence to the plaintiff's claim.
  3. 3 Whether the founding affidavit supporting summary judgment meets the personal knowledge requirement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's founding affidavit met the requirements of personal knowledge, as the deponent was the manager at the relevant time and location and explicitly stated such knowledge under oath. The defendant's attacks on the affidavit and particulars of claim were unfounded, relying on general denials and procedural technicalities rather than substantive facts. The defendant failed to set out a bona fide defence or material facts disputing the existence of the oral mandate agreement. The clause in the sale agreement between the defendant and the purchaser did not assist the defendant, as the plaintiff was not a party to that contract. The defendant's arguments...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of R1,243,170.00.
  • The defendant is ordered to pay interest a tempore morae on the above amount.