H v B (2016/10540) [2022] ZAGPJHC 844 (31 October 2022)
The court found that the defendant had persistently failed to comply with orders requiring a properly completed Financial Disclosure Form and supporting documentation, including bank statements for accounts in which he had an interest. The defendant's explanations regarding the ABSA account were unsubstantiated, as he did not provide any affidavit from his brother or himself under oath. The defendant had previously admitted to using the ABSA account to transfer proceeds from the sale of his property, triggering his obligation to disclose and provide statements. The court held that the defendant's conduct was wilful and mala fide, constituting contempt of court. The issue of executing the...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPJHC 844
- Parties
- Applicant: H [....], J [....] E [....]; Respondent: B [....], A [....]
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2022
- Case Number
- 2016/10540
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure Application / Post Contempt Hearing; Pre Trial Management
- Outcome
- The issue of executing the warrant of arrest against the defendant is postponed pending production of the ABSA account statements. The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs for the hearing and for updating discovery affidavits on an attorney and client scale. The conduct of the attorney representing the...
- Judges
- Spilg
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Financial Disclosure, Discovery Affidavit, Costs Order, Unprofessional Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
H [....], J [....] E [....]
Applicant
B [....], A [....]
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure Application / Post Contempt Hearing; Pre Trial Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is in contempt of court for failing to deliver a properly completed Financial Disclosure Form (FDF).
- 2 Whether the warrant of arrest issued against the defendant should be executed due to his de facto control of the ABSA account.
- 3 Whether the conduct of the attorney representing the defendant's brother constitutes unprofessional conduct.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant had persistently failed to comply with orders requiring a properly completed Financial Disclosure Form and supporting documentation, including bank statements for accounts in which he had an interest. The defendant's explanations regarding the ABSA account were unsubstantiated, as he did not provide any affidavit from his brother or himself under oath. The defendant had previously admitted to using the ABSA account to transfer proceeds from the sale of his property, triggering his obligation to disclose and provide statements. The court held that the defendant's conduct was wilful and mala fide, constituting contempt of court. The issue of executing the...
Court Disposition
The issue of executing the warrant of arrest against the defendant is postponed pending production of the ABSA account statements. The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs for the hearing and for updating discovery affidavits on an attorney and client scale. The conduct of the attorney representing the...
Orders
- The issue of executing the warrant of arrest against the defendant is postponed until the ABSA account statements are produced and de facto control is determined.
- Both parties must file updated supplementary discovery affidavits with copies of all additional documents by 23 November 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment