Hanekom v Voigt N.O and Others (15493/2014) [2014] ZAWCHC 194 (10 December 2014)
The court found that the new trust instrument was accepted by the Master, who issued letters of authority appointing the applicant and respondents as trustees. The applicant did not seek to review or set aside the Master’s administrative act, and the Oudekraal principle dictates that such acts remain valid until set...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] ZAWCHC 194
- Parties
- Applicant: Nicolene Hanekom; Respondent: Lizette Voigt N.O; Respondent: Lizette Voigt; Respondent: Janene Gertruida Goosen N.O; Respondent: Janene Gertruida Goosen; Respondent: Linda Marais N.O; Respondent: Linda Marais; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Cape Town; Respondent: Elizabeth Rene Marais
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2014
- Case Number
- 15493/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Ex Tempore Judgment on Main Application, Counter Application, and Removal Application
- Outcome
- The application for declaratory relief is dismissed with costs. The applicant’s application to amend her notice of motion is granted. The counter-application and removal application are referred to trial. Costs of the counter-application and removal application are reserved for later determination.
- Judges
- J I Cloete
- Legal Topics
- Trust Amendment, Declaratory Relief, Trustee Removal, Administrative Act Review, Sale of Trust Property
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicolene Hanekom
Applicant
Lizette Voigt N.O
Respondent
Lizette Voigt
Respondent
Janene Gertruida Goosen N.O
Respondent
Janene Gertruida Goosen
Respondent
Linda Marais N.O
Respondent
Linda Marais
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Cape Town
Respondent
Elizabeth Rene Marais
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Ex Tempore Judgment on Main Application, Counter Application, and Removal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the memorandum of agreement dated 5 April 2001 (the new trust instrument) is valid or void.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to declaratory relief regarding the validity of the new trust instrument.
- 3 Whether the Master’s administrative act in issuing letters of authority based on the new trust instrument can be impugned in these proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the new trust instrument was accepted by the Master, who issued letters of authority appointing the applicant and respondents as trustees. The applicant did not seek to review or set aside the Master’s administrative act, and the Oudekraal principle dictates that such acts remain valid until set aside. Declaratory relief was refused as it would yield no practical benefit to the applicant; if granted, it would leave the trust without trustees, as the sole trustee under the old instrument is deceased. The respondents, by majority, may proceed with the sale of Die Opstal. The counter-application and removal application involve extensive factual disputes and are referred...
Court Disposition
The application for declaratory relief is dismissed with costs. The applicant’s application to amend her notice of motion is granted. The counter-application and removal application are referred to trial. Costs of the counter-application and removal application are reserved for later determination.
Orders
- The applicant’s application for leave to amend her notice of motion is granted.
- The application for declaratory relief is dismissed with costs, including reserved costs and costs of two counsel where employed, payable by the applicant in her personal capacity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment