Harmony Gold Mining Ltd and Another v Mbatha and Another (2023-0001343) [2023] ZAGPJHC 765 (5 July 2023)

Harmony Gold Mining Ltd and Another v Mbatha and Another (2023-0001343) [2023] ZAGPJHC 765 (5 July 2023)

The court found that the respondents, particularly Mr Mbatha, deliberately violated the court order issued on 12 April 2023 by participating in a protest on 13 April 2023, which was not authorized by any valid permit. The defence that the order was not explained in a language understood by Mr Mbatha was rejected, as evidence showed he was proficient in English and communicated effectively in that language. The applicants discharged the onus of proving contempt, as all requirements were met: existence of the order, service, and non-compliance. The court also expressed concern regarding the conduct of Mr Madikane and African Black Lawyers Foundation NPC, finding prima facie evidence of...

Citation
[2023] ZAGPJHC 765
Parties
Applicant: Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited; Applicant: Randfontein Estates Limited; Respondent: Bongumusa Cyprian Mbatha; Respondent: Thuthukani Community Development NPC
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 July 2023
Case Number
2023-0001343
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Contempt Application Following Breach of Court Order
Outcome
Application granted. Respondents found in contempt of court and ordered to comply with the original order within seven days. Costs awarded against first and second respondents on attorney and client scale.
Judges
ML Senyatsi
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Urgent Interdict, Bill of Rights Limitation, Legal Practice Act Violation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited

Applicant

Randfontein Estates Limited

Applicant

Bongumusa Cyprian Mbatha

Respondent

Thuthukani Community Development NPC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Contempt Application Following Breach of Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the respondents are in contempt of the court order granted on 12 April 2023.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents' protest on 13 April 2023 constituted a deliberate and mala fide breach of the order.
  3. 3 Whether the defence that the order was not explained in a language understood by the first respondent is valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents, particularly Mr Mbatha, deliberately violated the court order issued on 12 April 2023 by participating in a protest on 13 April 2023, which was not authorized by any valid permit. The defence that the order was not explained in a language understood by Mr Mbatha was rejected, as evidence showed he was proficient in English and communicated effectively in that language. The applicants discharged the onus of proving contempt, as all requirements were met: existence of the order, service, and non-compliance. The court also expressed concern regarding the conduct of Mr Madikane and African Black Lawyers Foundation NPC, finding prima facie evidence of...

Court Disposition

Application granted. Respondents found in contempt of court and ordered to comply with the original order within seven days. Costs awarded against first and second respondents on attorney and client scale.

Orders

  • The application is heard as an urgent application under Rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court.
  • The first and/or second respondents are declared not to have complied with the Mudau J order and are directed to comply within seven days.