Harrington v Panayotides (68028/2012) [2015] ZAGPPHC 688 (25 September 2015)

The court found that there is no reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion on the facts of the matter. All issues raised in the application for leave to appeal had already been addressed in the previous judgment. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.

Citation: [2015] ZAGPPHC 688
Parties: Applicant: William Jacobus Harrington; Respondent: Constantine Panayotides
Court: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction: South Africa
Judgment Date: 25 September 2015
Case Number: 68028/2012
Procedural Posture: Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges: C Pretorius
Legal Topics: Leave to Appeal, Costs Order

Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

William Jacobus Harrington

Applicant

Constantine Panayotides

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether there is a reasonable prospect that another court may reach a different conclusion on the facts.
2 Whether the issues raised in the application for leave to appeal warrant reconsideration.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.