Hassam v Jacobs NO and Others (5704/2004) [2008] ZAWCHC 37; [2008] 4 All SA 350 (C) (18 July 2008)
The court held that the exclusion of surviving spouses of polygynous Muslim marriages from the benefits of the Intestate Succession Act and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act constitutes unfair discrimination based on marital status, religion, and culture, and infringes their constitutional rights to equality and dignity. The statutory language is capable of being interpreted to include multiple spouses, and where linguistic difficulties arise, such as in section 1(4)(f) of the Intestate Succession Act, a reading-in remedy is appropriate to ensure constitutional compliance. The court declared that both Acts must be interpreted to include surviving spouses of polygynous Muslim...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAWCHC 37
- Parties
- Applicant: Fatima Gabie Hassam; Respondent: Johan Hermanus Jacobs N.O.; Respondent: Master of the High Court; Respondent: Miriam Hassam; Respondent: Miriam Hassam N.O.; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development; Amicus Curiae: Women's Legal Centre Trust
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2008
- Case Number
- 5704/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Application / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The court declared that surviving spouses of polygynous Muslim marriages are entitled to benefits under the Intestate Succession Act and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act, and ordered a constitutional remedy for section 1(4)(f) of the Intestate Succession Act.
- Judges
- D Van Reenen
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Maintenance of Surviving Spouses, Muslim Personal Law, Equality, Discrimination, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fatima Gabie Hassam
Applicant
Johan Hermanus Jacobs N.O.
Respondent
Master of the High Court
Respondent
Miriam Hassam
Respondent
Miriam Hassam N.O.
Respondent
Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
Respondent
Women's Legal Centre Trust
Amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether surviving spouses of polygynous Muslim marriages are entitled to benefits under the Intestate Succession Act and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act.
- 2 Whether the exclusion of such spouses from the definition of 'spouse' and 'survivor' in the respective Acts is unconstitutional.
- 3 Whether section 1(4)(f) of the Intestate Succession Act is inconsistent with the Constitution for limiting inheritance to one spouse.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the exclusion of surviving spouses of polygynous Muslim marriages from the benefits of the Intestate Succession Act and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act constitutes unfair discrimination based on marital status, religion, and culture, and infringes their constitutional rights to equality and dignity. The statutory language is capable of being interpreted to include multiple spouses, and where linguistic difficulties arise, such as in section 1(4)(f) of the Intestate Succession Act, a reading-in remedy is appropriate to ensure constitutional compliance. The court declared that both Acts must be interpreted to include surviving spouses of polygynous Muslim...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The court declared that surviving spouses of polygynous Muslim marriages are entitled to benefits under the Intestate Succession Act and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act, and ordered a constitutional remedy for section 1(4)(f) of the Intestate Succession Act.
Orders
- It is declared that the word 'survivor' in the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act 27 of 1990 includes a surviving partner to a polygamous Muslim marriage.
- Fatima Gabie Hassam and Miriam Hassam are 'survivors' of the late Ebrahim Hassam for the purposes of the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act 27 of 1990.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment