Hattingh v Roux NO and Others (2011 (5) SA 135 (WCC)) [2011] ZAWCHC 100; 18650/07 (4 May 2011)
The court found, on a balance of probabilities, that Alex Roux executed the manoeuvre coded 'jack-knife' by deliberately placing his head in the incorrect channel of the scrum, thereby blocking Ryand Hattingh's channel and causing direct force onto Ryand's neck, resulting in serious injury. This conduct was not only forbidden by the laws of rugby but constituted a serious transgression not normally associated with the game, and was unexpected and extremely dangerous. The court held that such conduct was wrongful and intentional, and not a risk reasonably consented to by participants in rugby. The defence of consent failed because Ryand could not have appreciated or consented to the risk...
- Citation
- [2011] ZAWCHC 100
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ferdi Hattingh (in his personal capacity and on behalf of Ryand Karel Hattingh); Defendant: Mr Roux N.O.; Defendant: Alex Roux; Respondent: Ben Malan; Respondent: DP van Emmenis; Respondent: Cameron Dugmore N.O.
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 2011
- Case Number
- 18650/07
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Merits Trial; Quantum Reserved
- Outcome
- Second defendant found liable to pay damages to plaintiff and Ryand Karel Hattingh for injuries sustained in the rugby match.
- Judges
- P B Fourie
- Legal Topics
- Sports Injury Liability, Volenti Non Fit Injuria, Wrongfulness and Fault, Consent to Risk, Negligence, Intentional Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ferdi Hattingh (in his personal capacity and on behalf of Ryand Karel Hattingh)
Plaintiff
Mr Roux N.O.
Defendant
Alex Roux
Defendant
Ben Malan
Respondent
DP van Emmenis
Respondent
Cameron Dugmore N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits Trial; Quantum Reserved
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the injury sustained by Ryand Karel Hattingh during a rugby match was caused by the wrongful and culpable conduct of Alex Roux.
- 2 Whether the manoeuvre executed by Alex Roux constituted a serious transgression not normally associated with rugby and was therefore actionable.
- 3 Whether Ryand Karel Hattingh consented to the risk of injury in the manner in which it occurred, thereby excluding liability.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on a balance of probabilities, that Alex Roux executed the manoeuvre coded 'jack-knife' by deliberately placing his head in the incorrect channel of the scrum, thereby blocking Ryand Hattingh's channel and causing direct force onto Ryand's neck, resulting in serious injury. This conduct was not only forbidden by the laws of rugby but constituted a serious transgression not normally associated with the game, and was unexpected and extremely dangerous. The court held that such conduct was wrongful and intentional, and not a risk reasonably consented to by participants in rugby. The defence of consent failed because Ryand could not have appreciated or consented to the risk...
Court Disposition
Second defendant found liable to pay damages to plaintiff and Ryand Karel Hattingh for injuries sustained in the rugby match.
Orders
- It is declared that the second defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff and his son, Ryand Karel Hattingh, such damages as they may prove they have suffered as a consequence of the neck injury sustained by Ryand Karel Hattingh in the rugby match played between the under 19A teams of Labori High School and...
- The second defendant is to pay the plaintiffs' costs of suit, including the costs of two counsel and the qualifying charges of the expert witnesses Dr. Z. Domingo and Mr. I. S. De V. Swan.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment