Hay v Road Accident Fund (2019/5932) [2025] ZAGPJHC 278 (14 March 2025)
The court found that the mortgage loan agreement between the parties expressly provided for costs on the attorney and client scale in the event of enforcement proceedings. The applicants prosecuted the application in a half-hearted manner, failing to file heads of argument and allowing the matter to drift, which necessitated the respondents' intervention to set the matter down. In light of the contractual provision and the applicants' conduct, the court held that a costs order on the attorney and client scale was both necessary and appropriate. The application was accordingly withdrawn with costs awarded against the applicants on the attorney and client scale.
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 278
- Parties
- Applicant: Teresa Thring and Another; Respondent: ABSA Bank Limited and Others
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2025
- Case Number
- 46032/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Rescission and Withdrawal
- Outcome
- Application withdrawn by leave; costs awarded against applicants on attorney and client scale.
- Judges
- Wilson
- Legal Topics
- Costs Scale, Mortgage Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresa Thring and Another
Applicant
ABSA Bank Limited and Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Rescission and Withdrawal
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the applicants be permitted to withdraw their application for rescission of the reserve price order.
- 2 What is the appropriate scale of costs to be awarded against the applicants upon withdrawal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the mortgage loan agreement between the parties expressly provided for costs on the attorney and client scale in the event of enforcement proceedings. The applicants prosecuted the application in a half-hearted manner, failing to file heads of argument and allowing the matter to drift, which necessitated the respondents' intervention to set the matter down. In light of the contractual provision and the applicants' conduct, the court held that a costs order on the attorney and client scale was both necessary and appropriate. The application was accordingly withdrawn with costs awarded against the applicants on the attorney and client scale.
Court Disposition
Application withdrawn by leave; costs awarded against applicants on attorney and client scale.
Orders
- The applicants are given leave to withdraw their application.
- The applicants are directed to pay the costs of the application jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, on the scale as between attorney and client.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment