Hayes v Rheeder and Others (CA&R EL 886/08, ECD 2186/08) [2009] ZAECGHC 84 (26 November 2009)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the extension of the interim interdict, given the unresolved dispute over the existence of a partnership and the ownership of the assets. The first respondent's assertion of sole ownership was challenged by evidence of shared membership interests and financial links between the parties. The court declined to grant the applicant's request for all rental and proceeds to be paid into a trust account, finding that such an order would unduly restrict the commercial activities necessary for the maintenance of the property. The court also granted the joinder of the twelfth and thirteenth respondents and postponed the...
- Citation
- [2009] ZAECGHC 84
- Parties
- Applicant: Bryan Haynes; Respondent: Kim Rheeder; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds Eastern Cape; Respondent: Gravett, Schoeman, Van Rensburg & Moodley Inc.; Respondent: Coastal Hubbs CC; Respondent: East Coast Retailers CC; Respondent: Alljazz Liquors CC; Respondent: Umgazana Trading CC; Respondent: Coastal DIY CC; Respondent: The Registrar of Close Corporations; Respondent: Homenet Real Estate; Respondent: Mark Williams; Respondent: Craig Lindhorst; Respondent: Platinum Mile Investments 207 (PTY) LTD trading as Crossways Kwikspar
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2009
- Case Number
- CA&R EL 886/08, ECD 2186/08
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Interdict Application / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Interim Interdict, Joinder, and Further Relief
- Outcome
- Interim interdict extended; joinder of twelfth and thirteenth respondents granted; contempt application and costs postponed for later determination; supplementary relief regarding trust account payments declined.
- Judges
- Revelas
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Joinder of Parties, Partnership Dispute, Contempt of Court, Trust Account Payments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bryan Haynes
Applicant
Kim Rheeder
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds Eastern Cape
Respondent
Gravett, Schoeman, Van Rensburg & Moodley Inc.
Respondent
Coastal Hubbs CC
Respondent
East Coast Retailers CC
Respondent
Alljazz Liquors CC
Respondent
Umgazana Trading CC
Respondent
Coastal DIY CC
Respondent
The Registrar of Close Corporations
Respondent
Homenet Real Estate
Respondent
Mark Williams
Respondent
Craig Lindhorst
Respondent
Platinum Mile Investments 207 (PTY) LTD trading as Crossways Kwikspar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Interdict Application / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Interim Interdict, Joinder, and Further Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim interdict restraining the first respondent from dealing with certain properties and assets should be extended.
- 2 Whether the twelfth and thirteenth respondents should be joined to the main application.
- 3 Whether the first respondent should be interdicted from drawing funds against mortgage bonds over the properties.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the extension of the interim interdict, given the unresolved dispute over the existence of a partnership and the ownership of the assets. The first respondent's assertion of sole ownership was challenged by evidence of shared membership interests and financial links between the parties. The court declined to grant the applicant's request for all rental and proceeds to be paid into a trust account, finding that such an order would unduly restrict the commercial activities necessary for the maintenance of the property. The court also granted the joinder of the twelfth and thirteenth respondents and postponed the...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict extended; joinder of twelfth and thirteenth respondents granted; contempt application and costs postponed for later determination; supplementary relief regarding trust account payments declined.
Orders
- The Rule Nisi granted on 7 November 2008 is extended to 23 February 2010.
- Respondents are interdicted and restrained from passing transfer of specified properties pending finalisation of the partnership dissolution action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment