Haywood v S (A108/21) [2021] ZAWCHC 192 (21 September 2021)
The court found no misdirection in the magistrate's refusal of bail and held that the appellant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying release. The existence of a forged J7 bail release document in the appellant's prison file and the disappearance of the related fraud docket were considered prima facie evidence of an attempt to compromise the administration of justice. The seriousness of the charges, the strength of the State's case, and the fact that the offences were committed while the appellant was out on bail further weighed against release. The court concluded that granting bail would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and dismissed the appeal.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAWCHC 192
- Parties
- Appellant: Moegsien Haywood; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2021
- Case Number
- A108/21
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; bail refused.
- Judges
- Kusevitsky
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Schedule 6 Offences, Exceptional Circumstances, Administration of Justice, Condonation, Forged Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moegsien Haywood
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has shown exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail for Schedule 6 offences.
- 2 Whether the lower court erred in refusing bail to the appellant.
- 3 Whether the existence of a forged J7 bail release document impacts the interests of justice regarding bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no misdirection in the magistrate's refusal of bail and held that the appellant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying release. The existence of a forged J7 bail release document in the appellant's prison file and the disappearance of the related fraud docket were considered prima facie evidence of an attempt to compromise the administration of justice. The seriousness of the charges, the strength of the State's case, and the fact that the offences were committed while the appellant was out on bail further weighed against release. The court concluded that granting bail would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and dismissed the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; bail refused.
Orders
- Condonation for late filing of the appeal is granted.
- The appeal against the refusal of bail is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment