Haywood v S (A108/21) [2021] ZAWCHC 192 (21 September 2021)

Haywood v S (A108/21) [2021] ZAWCHC 192 (21 September 2021)

The court found no misdirection in the magistrate's refusal of bail and held that the appellant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying release. The existence of a forged J7 bail release document in the appellant's prison file and the disappearance of the related fraud docket were considered prima facie evidence of an attempt to compromise the administration of justice. The seriousness of the charges, the strength of the State's case, and the fact that the offences were committed while the appellant was out on bail further weighed against release. The court concluded that granting bail would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and dismissed the appeal.

Citation
[2021] ZAWCHC 192
Parties
Appellant: Moegsien Haywood; Respondent: The State
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 September 2021
Case Number
A108/21
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; bail refused.
Judges
Kusevitsky
Legal Topics
Bail Application, Schedule 6 Offences, Exceptional Circumstances, Administration of Justice, Condonation, Forged Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moegsien Haywood

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has shown exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail for Schedule 6 offences.
  2. 2 Whether the lower court erred in refusing bail to the appellant.
  3. 3 Whether the existence of a forged J7 bail release document impacts the interests of justice regarding bail.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no misdirection in the magistrate's refusal of bail and held that the appellant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying release. The existence of a forged J7 bail release document in the appellant's prison file and the disappearance of the related fraud docket were considered prima facie evidence of an attempt to compromise the administration of justice. The seriousness of the charges, the strength of the State's case, and the fact that the offences were committed while the appellant was out on bail further weighed against release. The court concluded that granting bail would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and dismissed the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; bail refused.

Orders

  • Condonation for late filing of the appeal is granted.
  • The appeal against the refusal of bail is dismissed.