Heese obo Peters v Road Accident Fund (10009/2004) [2011] ZAWCHC 497; 2012 (6) SA 496 (WCC) (2 December 2011)

Heese obo Peters v Road Accident Fund (10009/2004) [2011] ZAWCHC 497; 2012 (6) SA 496 (WCC) (2 December 2011)

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove any compensable loss of earning capacity. Although Mr Peters operated a profitable business and evaded tax, the evidence showed that, had he not been injured, he would likely have returned to Germany and resumed his business. However, the magnitude and blatancy of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] ZAWCHC 497
Parties
Plaintiff: Adre Elizabeth Heese (curatrix ad litem for Ulrich Hans Peters); Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
2 December 2011
Case Number
10009/2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages (loss of Earnings/earning Capacity)
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim is dismissed. Judgment is granted in favour of the defendant.
Judges
Blignault
Legal Topics
Loss of Earning Capacity, Road Accident Fund Act, Tax Evasion, Quantification of Damages, Admissibility of Evidence
Delict Loss of Earning Capacity Road Accident Fund Act Tax Evasion Quantification of Damages Admissibility of Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adre Elizabeth Heese (curatrix ad litem for Ulrich Hans Peters)

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages (loss of Earnings/earning Capacity)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff proved any loss of earning capacity as a result of the accident.
  2. 2 Whether income derived from illegal tax evasion may be considered in quantifying damages for loss of earnings.
  3. 3 Whether the evidence presented by the plaintiff regarding Mr Peters' business and lifestyle supports the claim for damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove any compensable loss of earning capacity. Although Mr Peters operated a profitable business and evaded tax, the evidence showed that, had he not been injured, he would likely have returned to Germany and resumed his business. However, the magnitude and blatancy of his tax evasion constituted common law fraud, and the German tax authorities were already investigating him. Had Mr Peters not been incapacitated, criminal proceedings would have ensued, resulting in a lengthy prison sentence and the collapse of his business. There was no evidence that he could have earned any income during or after incarceration. The court held that the illegal...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim is dismissed. Judgment is granted in favour of the defendant.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
  • Plaintiff is ordered to pay the defendant's costs.