Hesewu and Another v School Governing Body, Sunningdale Primary School and Another (15908/2020) [2021] ZAWCHC 212 (26 October 2021)
The court found that the admissions policy of Sunningdale Primary School, which gives preference to learners residing in Sunningdale and those with siblings at the school, is lawful, rational, and consistent with the Schools Act and constitutional principles. The governing body is empowered to determine admissions policy, including feeder zones, provided there is no unfair discrimination. The evidence did not support the applicants' allegations of indirect racial discrimination or exclusion, as admissions statistics showed significant integration and no material difference in the socio-economic or ethnic composition of the relevant areas. The applicants' challenge was found to be...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAWCHC 212
- Parties
- Applicant: Sango Melikhaya Hesewu; Applicant: Felicia Lenoholo Hesewu; Respondent: School Governing Body, Sunningdale Primary School; Respondent: Minister for Education: Western Cape
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2021
- Case Number
- 15908/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs awarded against the applicants.
- Judges
- Binns-Ward
- Legal Topics
- School Admissions Policy, Bill of Rights Limitation, Unfair Discrimination, Judicial Review, Public Interest Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sango Melikhaya Hesewu
Applicant
Felicia Lenoholo Hesewu
Applicant
School Governing Body, Sunningdale Primary School
Respondent
Minister for Education: Western Cape
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the school governing body's admissions policy, which gives preference to learners residing in Sunningdale and/or with siblings at the school, is unconstitutional, unlawful, or invalid.
- 2 Whether the applicants' challenge to the admissions policy demonstrates unfair discrimination or indirect racial exclusion.
- 3 Whether the governing body has the legal authority to determine feeder zones as part of its admissions policy.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the admissions policy of Sunningdale Primary School, which gives preference to learners residing in Sunningdale and those with siblings at the school, is lawful, rational, and consistent with the Schools Act and constitutional principles. The governing body is empowered to determine admissions policy, including feeder zones, provided there is no unfair discrimination. The evidence did not support the applicants' allegations of indirect racial discrimination or exclusion, as admissions statistics showed significant integration and no material difference in the socio-economic or ethnic composition of the relevant areas. The applicants' challenge was found to be...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs awarded against the applicants.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicants are liable, jointly and severally, for the first respondent's costs of suit, including the wasted costs incurred in respect of the aborted enlistment of the application for hearing on 27 November 2020.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment