High Rustenberg Estate (Pty) Ltd v NEHAWU obo Cornelius and Others (CA11/2016) [2017] ZALAC 20; (2017) 38 ILJ 1758 (LAC) (23 March 2017)
The Labour Appeal Court held that section 197(5) of the LRA binds the new employer to an arbitration award that was binding on the old employer immediately before the transfer, even if the award is subsequently substituted by the Labour Court after the transfer. The substitution of the award does not alter its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] ZALAC 20
- Parties
- Appellant: High Rustenberg Estate (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: NEHAWU obo J Cornelius and 17 Others; Respondent: High Rustenberg Hydro (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2017
- Case Number
- CA 11/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment on Stated Case
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Davis JA, Hlophe AJJA, Kathree-Setiloane AJJA
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Business, Section 197 Lra, Arbitration Award Enforcement, Joinder, Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
High Rustenberg Estate (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
NEHAWU obo J Cornelius and 17 Others
Respondent
High Rustenberg Hydro (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment on Stated Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 197(5) of the Labour Relations Act bind a new employer to an arbitration award reversed and substituted by the Labour Court after the transfer of the business?
- 2 Is the new employer required to be joined to proceedings before execution against its property can occur?
- 3 Does the substitution of an arbitration award by the Labour Court affect the binding nature of the award on the new employer under section 197?
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that section 197(5) of the LRA binds the new employer to an arbitration award that was binding on the old employer immediately before the transfer, even if the award is subsequently substituted by the Labour Court after the transfer. The substitution of the award does not alter its binding nature, as the rights and obligations continue seamlessly from the old to the new employer. The timing of the review or appeal does not affect the employees' rights against the new employer. The Court distinguished the present case from Ngema, noting that the issue here was not reinstatement but compensation, and that the new employer had been afforded an opportunity to be...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
- The order of the Labour Court is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment