High School Ermelo and Another v Head of the Department Mpumalanga Department of Education and Others (30627/07) [2007] ZAGPHC 165; [2008] 1 All SA 139 (T) (29 August 2007)
The court found that the applicants failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing their notice of application for leave to appeal. The delay was attributed to gross ineptitude by their legal representatives, who submitted a fatally defective notice and wasted time by prematurely approaching the Supreme Court of Appeal. The subsequent attempt to amend an unamendable notice further delayed proceedings. The court held that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal and that the main application was about to be heard, so any prejudice to the applicants was mitigated. Accordingly, condonation was refused, and the application for leave to appeal was struck from...
- Citation
- [2007] ZAGPHC 165
- Parties
- Applicant: High School Ermelo; Applicant: Governing Body of High School Ermelo; Respondent: The Head of the Department Mpumalanga Department of Education; Respondent: Ms Jina Khudaija; Respondent: Mr Danka Munera; Respondent: Mr Essay Yaood; Respondent: Mr Coenie van Greunen; Respondent: Ms Queen Nqoele; Respondent: Jacobus Kruger; Respondent: The Minister of Education; Respondent: Ncane Elizabeth Masilela
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2007
- Case Number
- 30627/07
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Condonation and Leave to Appeal Following Rescission and Refusal of Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Application for condonation dismissed; application for leave to appeal struck from the roll; costs awarded against applicants.
- Judges
- B M Ngoepe, W L Seriti, N Ranchod
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Leave to Appeal, Interim Interdict, Joinder of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
High School Ermelo
Applicant
Governing Body of High School Ermelo
Applicant
The Head of the Department Mpumalanga Department of Education
Respondent
Ms Jina Khudaija
Respondent
Mr Danka Munera
Respondent
Mr Essay Yaood
Respondent
Mr Coenie van Greunen
Respondent
Ms Queen Nqoele
Respondent
Jacobus Kruger
Respondent
The Minister of Education
Respondent
Ncane Elizabeth Masilela
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Condonation and Leave to Appeal Following Rescission and Refusal of Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation for late filing of notice of application for leave to appeal should be granted.
- 2 Whether the application for leave to appeal against the orders made on 13 February 2007 should be entertained.
- 3 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing their notice of application for leave to appeal. The delay was attributed to gross ineptitude by their legal representatives, who submitted a fatally defective notice and wasted time by prematurely approaching the Supreme Court of Appeal. The subsequent attempt to amend an unamendable notice further delayed proceedings. The court held that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal and that the main application was about to be heard, so any prejudice to the applicants was mitigated. Accordingly, condonation was refused, and the application for leave to appeal was struck from...
Court Disposition
Application for condonation dismissed; application for leave to appeal struck from the roll; costs awarded against applicants.
Orders
- The applicants' application for condonation of the late filing of notice of application for leave to appeal against the orders made by this court on 13 February 2007 is dismissed.
- The applicants' application for leave to appeal filed on 14 February 2007 is struck from the roll.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment