Highveld Sundication NO. 16 (Pty) Ltd and Others v Ji An Import & Export (Pty) Ltd and Another (46782/13) [2014] ZAGPJHC 383 (5 December 2014)
The court found that the applicants were entitled to the relief sought. The respondents admitted the lease and arrears, and abandoned all substantive defences except for technical objections regarding locus standi and property description. The court held that the identity of the lessor was sufficiently established by the registration number, and minor errors in the property description did not preclude relief as the premises were clearly identified and occupied by the respondents. The applicants withdrew previous actions and undertook to pay wasted costs. The respondents' remaining objections were without merit. The court granted eviction, payment of arrears with interest, and costs...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAGPJHC 383
- Parties
- Applicant: Highveld Sundication NO. 16 (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Orthotouch Ltd; Applicant: Zephan Properties (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Moxicorp Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ji An Import & Export (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Wang Jun
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 2014
- Case Number
- 46782/13
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted: eviction, payment of arrears, and costs ordered against respondents.
- Judges
- P L Carstensen
- Legal Topics
- Commercial Lease, Eviction, Arrear Rental, Locus Standi, Property Description, Rectification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Highveld Sundication NO. 16 (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Orthotouch Ltd
Applicant
Zephan Properties (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Moxicorp Investments (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Ji An Import & Export (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Wang Jun
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to evict the first respondent from the leased premises.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to payment of arrear rental and interest.
- 3 Whether the applicants have locus standi to enforce the lease agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were entitled to the relief sought. The respondents admitted the lease and arrears, and abandoned all substantive defences except for technical objections regarding locus standi and property description. The court held that the identity of the lessor was sufficiently established by the registration number, and minor errors in the property description did not preclude relief as the premises were clearly identified and occupied by the respondents. The applicants withdrew previous actions and undertook to pay wasted costs. The respondents' remaining objections were without merit. The court granted eviction, payment of arrears with interest, and costs...
Court Disposition
Application granted: eviction, payment of arrears, and costs ordered against respondents.
Orders
- The First Respondent is ordered to vacate the premises at Piazza Centre, erven 544 to 552 and 604 to 612 Blairgowrie, Randburg, within 5 days.
- The Sheriff is authorised to do all things necessary to give effect to the eviction order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment