Hlophe v TS Galaxy FC (C1083/2018) [2022] ZALCCT 21 (9 May 2022)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish that a transfer of business as a going concern occurred under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The evidence showed only the sale of the right to participate in the NSL First Division, with no proof of asset or workforce transfer sufficient to constitute a business transfer. The applicant's acceptance of benefits under the proposed settlement agreement, without reservation or restitution, amounted to tacit acceptance of its terms, rendering his claim unenforceable on grounds of public policy. The Labour Court therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the claim for contractual damages against the respondent, and the referral...
- Citation
- [2022] ZALCCT 21
- Parties
- Applicant: Menzi Hlophe; Respondent: TS Galaxy formerly known as Cape Town All Stars Football Club
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 May 2022
- Case Number
- C1083/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Judgment / In Limine Objections; Interlocutory Proceedings
- Outcome
- The applicant's referral is dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Transfer, Contractual Damages, Full and Final Settlement, Jurisdiction, Public Policy, Arbitration Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Menzi Hlophe
Applicant
TS Galaxy formerly known as Cape Town All Stars Football Club
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Judgment / In Limine Objections; Interlocutory Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a transfer of business as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act occurred between Cape Town All Stars and TS Galaxy.
- 2 Whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to entertain the applicant's claim for contractual damages against the respondent.
- 3 Whether the applicant is bound by a full and final settlement agreement despite not signing it.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to establish that a transfer of business as a going concern occurred under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The evidence showed only the sale of the right to participate in the NSL First Division, with no proof of asset or workforce transfer sufficient to constitute a business transfer. The applicant's acceptance of benefits under the proposed settlement agreement, without reservation or restitution, amounted to tacit acceptance of its terms, rendering his claim unenforceable on grounds of public policy. The Labour Court therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the claim for contractual damages against the respondent, and the referral...
Court Disposition
The applicant's referral is dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The respondent's in limine objection that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain the applicant's claim for contractual damages against the respondent, in the absence of a section 197 transfer, is upheld.
- The applicant's claim for contractual damages arising from the termination of his employment by his former employer is unenforceable on grounds of public policy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment