Holdsworth-Jenkins and Another v Worldwind Logistics (Pty) Ltd In re: Worldwind Logistics (Pty) Limited v Holtsworths-Jenkins and Another (28255/2018) [2021] ZAGPJHC 886 (5 July 2021)
The court found that the applicants failed to advance any cogent grounds that could lead another court to a different decision. The facts found to be common cause were correctly determined, and the Plascon Evans rule was properly applied. The applicability of the Rental Housing Act and Consumer Protection Act was correctly reasoned in the original judgment, and there are no reasonable prospects of success or compelling reasons justifying leave to appeal. The counterclaim was correctly dismissed, and the issues raised do not amount to special circumstances or matters of public interest. The application for leave to appeal is therefore dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 886
- Parties
- Applicant: Jaqueline-Jane Holdsworth-Jenkins; Applicant: Lee Evan Jenkins; Respondent: Worldwind Logistics (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 July 2021
- Case Number
- 28255/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 16 March 2021
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Majavu
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Threshold, Lease Agreement Dispute, Application of Consumer Protection Act, Application of Rental Housing Act, Counterclaim Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jaqueline-Jane Holdsworth-Jenkins
Applicant
Lee Evan Jenkins
Applicant
Worldwind Logistics (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 16 March 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion on the merits of the original judgment.
- 2 Whether the Plascon Evans rule was correctly applied regarding disputed facts in motion proceedings.
- 3 Whether the Rental Housing Act and Consumer Protection Act are applicable to the dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to advance any cogent grounds that could lead another court to a different decision. The facts found to be common cause were correctly determined, and the Plascon Evans rule was properly applied. The applicability of the Rental Housing Act and Consumer Protection Act was correctly reasoned in the original judgment, and there are no reasonable prospects of success or compelling reasons justifying leave to appeal. The counterclaim was correctly dismissed, and the issues raised do not amount to special circumstances or matters of public interest. The application for leave to appeal is therefore dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs, on a party and party scale, including costs consequent upon the employment of counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment