HR Focus CC v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (1121/2020) [2023] ZAECMKHC 111 (17 October 2023)

HR Focus CC v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (1121/2020) [2023] ZAECMKHC 111 (17 October 2023)

The court held that the applicant was granted leave only to deliver a supplementary replying affidavit, not a multi-purpose affidavit combining supplementary founding and replying content. The applicant's supplementary affidavit failed to comply with the court's order and the Uniform Rules of Court, as it was impossible to distinguish which portions supplemented the founding affidavit and which replied to the respondent's answering affidavit. This uncertainty would prejudice the respondent and undermine procedural fairness. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying the admission of the affidavit and noted that the pending Tax Appeal Court proceedings could materially affect...

Citation
[2023] ZAECMKHC 111
Parties
Applicant: HR Focus CC; Respondent: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 October 2023
Case Number
1121/2020
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Judgment on Interlocutory Applications Regarding Affidavits and Condonation
Outcome
The respondent's application to strike out is granted; the applicant's supplementary founding and replying affidavit is struck out in its entirety. The applicant's interlocutory application for condonation and leave to supplement is dismissed. Costs are awarded to the respondent on a party and party scale, including...
Judges
Laing
Legal Topics
Supplementary Affidavit, Condonation, Striking Out, Employment Tax Incentive, Locus Standi

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HR Focus CC

Applicant

Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Judgment on Interlocutory Applications Regarding Affidavits and Condonation

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's supplementary founding and replying affidavit should be admitted or struck out.
  2. 2 Whether condonation should be granted for the late delivery of the applicant's supplementary affidavit.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has locus standi to claim Employment Tax Incentive refunds as agent for its clients.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant was granted leave only to deliver a supplementary replying affidavit, not a multi-purpose affidavit combining supplementary founding and replying content. The applicant's supplementary affidavit failed to comply with the court's order and the Uniform Rules of Court, as it was impossible to distinguish which portions supplemented the founding affidavit and which replied to the respondent's answering affidavit. This uncertainty would prejudice the respondent and undermine procedural fairness. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying the admission of the affidavit and noted that the pending Tax Appeal Court proceedings could materially affect...

Court Disposition

The respondent's application to strike out is granted; the applicant's supplementary founding and replying affidavit is struck out in its entirety. The applicant's interlocutory application for condonation and leave to supplement is dismissed. Costs are awarded to the respondent on a party and party scale, including...

Orders

  • The respondent's application to strike out, dated 17 July 2023, is granted, and the applicant's supplementary founding affidavit and replying affidavit to the respondent's supplementary answering affidavit is struck out in its entirety.
  • The applicant's interlocutory application, dated 21 July 2023, is dismissed.