Ikwezi Vanadium (Pty) Ltd v Ditsele and Others (UM120/2019) [2019] ZANWHC 60 (2 September 2019)

Ikwezi Vanadium (Pty) Ltd v Ditsele and Others (UM120/2019) [2019] ZANWHC 60 (2 September 2019)

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to conduct bulk sampling operations on the property and that the respondents' conduct, including trespass, intimidation, and obstruction, constituted unlawful interference. The joinder of additional respondents was necessary as their actions...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] ZANWHC 60
Parties
Applicant: Ikwezi Vanadium (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ditsele, Thabang Sam; Respondent: Those Further Persons Interfering in the Applicant's Bulk Sampling Operations; Respondent: Nzala, Themba; Respondent: D E Thabeka; Respondent: M A Nzala; Respondent: H Matlala; Respondent: B S Mlaka; Respondent: S I Letageng; Respondent: A Modise Phefo; Respondent: Kolobe, Prince; Respondent: Mamatu, Bernard; Respondent: MK Melewe; Respondent: Sikwana, David; Respondent: Gxamthani, Mthuthuzeli; Respondent: Nzala, Wandile; Respondent: Present, Doctor; Respondent: Nzala, Douglas; Respondent: Tumani, Obakeng; Respondent: SP Motshabi; Respondent: Ntakile, Donald; Respondent: Nsthabile, Victor; Respondent: Kobedi, Tshepiso; Respondent: Mamatu, Sidwe; Respondent: Mosotho, Thabang; Respondent: Donawa, Ayanda; Respondent: Moketsi, Happy; Respondent: Ndakale, Herman; Respondent: Mantshiyo, Kabelo; Respondent: Minister of Police: General Bheki Cele; Respondent: National Commissioner of SAPS: General K J Sithole; Respondent: Station Commissioner of Mogwase SAPS Station: Colonel Raphata; Respondent: Sheriff of the High Court: Mankwe (Mogase)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
UM120/2019
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict and Joinder Order
Outcome
Interim interdict granted; joinder of respondents ordered; alternative service condoned; costs reserved.
Judges
DJAJE
Legal Topics
Interdict, Joinder of Parties, Trespass, Service of Process
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interdict Joinder of Parties Trespass Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ikwezi Vanadium (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Ditsele, Thabang Sam

Respondent

Those Further Persons Interfering in the Applicant's Bulk Sampling Operations

Respondent

Nzala, Themba

Respondent

D E Thabeka

Respondent

M A Nzala

Respondent

H Matlala

Respondent

B S Mlaka

Respondent

S I Letageng

Respondent

A Modise Phefo

Respondent

Kolobe, Prince

Respondent

Mamatu, Bernard

Respondent

MK Melewe

Respondent

Sikwana, David

Respondent

Gxamthani, Mthuthuzeli

Respondent

Nzala, Wandile

Respondent

Present, Doctor

Respondent

Nzala, Douglas

Respondent

Tumani, Obakeng

Respondent

SP Motshabi

Respondent

Ntakile, Donald

Respondent

Nsthabile, Victor

Respondent

Kobedi, Tshepiso

Respondent

Mamatu, Sidwe

Respondent

Mosotho, Thabang

Respondent

Donawa, Ayanda

Respondent

Moketsi, Happy

Respondent

Ndakale, Herman

Respondent

Mantshiyo, Kabelo

Respondent

Minister of Police: General Bheki Cele

Respondent

National Commissioner of SAPS: General K J Sithole

Respondent

Station Commissioner of Mogwase SAPS Station: Colonel Raphata

Respondent

Sheriff of the High Court: Mankwe (Mogase)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Interim Interdict and Joinder Order

  1. 1 Whether the respondents should be joined as parties to the application.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an interim interdict restraining the respondents from interfering with its bulk sampling operations.
  3. 3 Whether alternative service of process should be condoned.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to conduct bulk sampling operations on the property and that the respondents' conduct, including trespass, intimidation, and obstruction, constituted unlawful interference. The joinder of additional respondents was necessary as their actions directly affected the applicant's rights and the relief sought. The requirements for an interim interdict were satisfied, as the applicant demonstrated a clear right, ongoing or reasonably apprehended harm, and no adequate alternative remedy. The court also accepted that alternative service was justified due to the practical difficulties in effecting personal service on all...

Court Disposition

Interim interdict granted; joinder of respondents ordered; alternative service condoned; costs reserved.

Orders

  • The 3rd to 32nd respondents are joined to the application under case number UM120/2019.
  • The rule nisi issued on 25 July 2019 is extended.