Ikwezi Vanadium (Pty) Ltd v Ditsele and Others (UM120/2019) [2019] ZANWHC 60 (2 September 2019)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to conduct bulk sampling operations on the property and that the respondents' conduct, including trespass, intimidation, and obstruction, constituted unlawful interference. The joinder of additional respondents was necessary as their actions...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] ZANWHC 60
- Parties
- Applicant: Ikwezi Vanadium (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ditsele, Thabang Sam; Respondent: Those Further Persons Interfering in the Applicant's Bulk Sampling Operations; Respondent: Nzala, Themba; Respondent: D E Thabeka; Respondent: M A Nzala; Respondent: H Matlala; Respondent: B S Mlaka; Respondent: S I Letageng; Respondent: A Modise Phefo; Respondent: Kolobe, Prince; Respondent: Mamatu, Bernard; Respondent: MK Melewe; Respondent: Sikwana, David; Respondent: Gxamthani, Mthuthuzeli; Respondent: Nzala, Wandile; Respondent: Present, Doctor; Respondent: Nzala, Douglas; Respondent: Tumani, Obakeng; Respondent: SP Motshabi; Respondent: Ntakile, Donald; Respondent: Nsthabile, Victor; Respondent: Kobedi, Tshepiso; Respondent: Mamatu, Sidwe; Respondent: Mosotho, Thabang; Respondent: Donawa, Ayanda; Respondent: Moketsi, Happy; Respondent: Ndakale, Herman; Respondent: Mantshiyo, Kabelo; Respondent: Minister of Police: General Bheki Cele; Respondent: National Commissioner of SAPS: General K J Sithole; Respondent: Station Commissioner of Mogwase SAPS Station: Colonel Raphata; Respondent: Sheriff of the High Court: Mankwe (Mogase)
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- UM120/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict and Joinder Order
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted; joinder of respondents ordered; alternative service condoned; costs reserved.
- Judges
- DJAJE
- Legal Topics
- Interdict, Joinder of Parties, Trespass, Service of Process
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ikwezi Vanadium (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Ditsele, Thabang Sam
Respondent
Those Further Persons Interfering in the Applicant's Bulk Sampling Operations
Respondent
Nzala, Themba
Respondent
D E Thabeka
Respondent
M A Nzala
Respondent
H Matlala
Respondent
B S Mlaka
Respondent
S I Letageng
Respondent
A Modise Phefo
Respondent
Kolobe, Prince
Respondent
Mamatu, Bernard
Respondent
MK Melewe
Respondent
Sikwana, David
Respondent
Gxamthani, Mthuthuzeli
Respondent
Nzala, Wandile
Respondent
Present, Doctor
Respondent
Nzala, Douglas
Respondent
Tumani, Obakeng
Respondent
SP Motshabi
Respondent
Ntakile, Donald
Respondent
Nsthabile, Victor
Respondent
Kobedi, Tshepiso
Respondent
Mamatu, Sidwe
Respondent
Mosotho, Thabang
Respondent
Donawa, Ayanda
Respondent
Moketsi, Happy
Respondent
Ndakale, Herman
Respondent
Mantshiyo, Kabelo
Respondent
Minister of Police: General Bheki Cele
Respondent
National Commissioner of SAPS: General K J Sithole
Respondent
Station Commissioner of Mogwase SAPS Station: Colonel Raphata
Respondent
Sheriff of the High Court: Mankwe (Mogase)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict and Joinder Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents should be joined as parties to the application.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an interim interdict restraining the respondents from interfering with its bulk sampling operations.
- 3 Whether alternative service of process should be condoned.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to conduct bulk sampling operations on the property and that the respondents' conduct, including trespass, intimidation, and obstruction, constituted unlawful interference. The joinder of additional respondents was necessary as their actions directly affected the applicant's rights and the relief sought. The requirements for an interim interdict were satisfied, as the applicant demonstrated a clear right, ongoing or reasonably apprehended harm, and no adequate alternative remedy. The court also accepted that alternative service was justified due to the practical difficulties in effecting personal service on all...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted; joinder of respondents ordered; alternative service condoned; costs reserved.
Orders
- The 3rd to 32nd respondents are joined to the application under case number UM120/2019.
- The rule nisi issued on 25 July 2019 is extended.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
89 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG)
CASE NO: UM 120 / 2019
Held at MMABATHO on this the 2nd day of SEPTEMBER 2019
BEFORE the Honourable Madam Justice DJAJE
In the matter between:
IKWEZI VANADIUM (PTY) LTD
(REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2009/ 023155/ 07)
Applicant
and
DITSELE, THABANG SAM 1st Respondent
THOSE FURTHER PERSONS INTERFERING
IN THE APPLICANT' S BULK SAMPLING OPERATIONS 2nd Respondent
NZALA, THEMBA 3rd respondent
D E THABEKA 4th Respondent
M A NZALA 5th Respondent
H MATLALA 6th Respondent
B S MLAKA 7th Respondent
S I LETAGENG 8th Respondent
A MODISE PHEFO
9th Respondent
KOLOBE, PRINCE
10th Respondent
MAMATU, BERNARD
11th Respondent
MK MELEWE
12th Respondent
SIKWANA, DAVID
13th Respondent
GXAMTHANI, MTHUTHUZELI
14th Respondent
NZALA, WANDILE
15th Respondent
PRESENT, DOCTOR
16th Respondent
NZALA, DOUGLAS
17th Respondent
TUMANI, OBAKENG
18th Respondent
SP MOTSHABI
19th Respondent
NTAKILE, DONALD
20th Respondent
NSTHABILE, VICTOR
21st Respondent
KOBEDI, TSHEPISO
22nd Respondent
MAMATU, SIDWE
23rd Respondent
MOSOTHO, THABANG
24th Respondent
DONAWA, AYANDA
25th Respondent
MOKETSI, HAPPY
26th Respondent
NDAKALE, HERMAN
27th Respondent
MANTSHIYO, KABELO 28th Respondent
THE MINISTER OF POLICE: GENERAL
BHEKI CELE
29th Respondent
THE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF
THE SAPS: GENERAL K J SITHOLE
30th Respondent
THE STATION COMMISSIONER OF THE
MOGWASE SAPS STATION: COLONEL RAPHATA 31st Respondent
THE SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT: MANKWE (MOGASE) 32nd Respondent
HAVING HEARD ADV SCHOLTZ on behalf of the Applicant and First and Third in person and having read the Notice of Motion and other documents filed of record;
IT IS ORDERED
1. That THEMBA NZALA AND 29 OTHERS listed above be and hereby are joined to the application launched out of this Honourable Court under case number: UM120 / 2019, as the 3rd to 32nd Respondents.
2.That the rule nisi issued on 25 July 2019 be extended and the Respondents and any other interested party be called upon to show cause, if any, to this Honourable Court on the 5th day of September 2019 at 10h00 or so soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, why an order in the following terms should not be granted:
2.1 The Respondents are hereby interdicted and restrained from interfering with the Applicant's officials, agents, contractors or employees or the Sheriff of the Court or his lawfully appointed Deputy, in the carrying out of their obligations in terms of any order of this Honourable Court;
2.2 The Respondents are hereby interdicted and restrained from entering or accessing the fenced off area of Farm Haakdoornfontein 12 JQ and trespassing on such area in which the Applicant's bulk sampling activities are conducted;
2.3 The Respondents are hereby interdicted and restrained from blockading roads and entrances to the above farm or from denying access to the properties to any of the Applicant's officials, agents, contractors or employees;
2.4 The Respondents are interdicted and restrained from directly or indirectly threatening and/ or intimidating and/ or harming or instructing, coaxing, cajoling or in any other manner persuading any other persons to threaten, intimidate or assault any of the Applicant's officials, agents, contractors or employees or in any other way interfering with the conduct of the Applicant's bulk sampling operations;
2.5 The Sheriff of this Honourable Court or his/ her lawfully appointed Deputy is hereby authorised and directed to give effect to paragraphs 2.1 to 2.4 above, should it be necessary and in the event that the Respondents fail to comply with paragraphs 2.1 to 2.4 above.
2.6 The Sheriff of the Court is authorised and directed to approach the South African Police Services for any assistance he/ she may deem appropriate herein.
2.7 That further or alternative relief be granted to the Applicant.
2.8 Entering for any unlawful purpose and trespassing on the property or the demarcated area allocated for the Applicant's bulk sampling operations;
2.9 Gathering at the property or within 250 meters of the demarcated area, including the Applicant's facilities, installations and machinery;
2.10 Blockading the road, and/ or the entrances to the property;
2.11 Directly or indirectly threatening and/ or intimidating and/ or harming or instructing, coaxing, cajoling or in any other manner persuading any other person to threaten, intimidate or assault any of the Applicant's employees, agents or contractors at the property.
2.12 That in the event that the 1stto 28th Respondents fail to comply with the above, the 29th to 31st Respondents are authorised and directed to take all such reasonable steps to:
2.12.1 Enforce the order above and to prevent any further such unlawful conduct;
2.12.2 Assist the Sheriff of the Court to take all reasonable steps to give effect to the order above.
2.13 Should the 29th to 31st Respondents fail to comply with the terms set out above, the Applicant is authorised to employ the services of a third party security agency in order to take all reasonable steps to enforce the order and prevent any further illegal activities."
3 That the Applicant is entitled to serve this application and all further processes and notices, including any order of this Honourable Court herein on the 3rd to 8th Respondents by way of e-mail to the addresses provided by them on 19 June 2019 as contained in annexure "SA-2" above and service in such manner be and hereby is condoned. Applicant will further service this application and order on the remaining Respondents attaching some to a notice Board at the premises.
4 That costs be reserved for determination at the hearing of the application on 26 September 2019.
VR T W