IMATU obo Members v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (JR3058/14) [2016] ZALCJHB 394 (12 October 2016)
The court held that the arbitrator's award was legally binding and enforceable, as it converted the status quo of the 12 hour shift system into a binding arrangement after the expiry of the six-month negotiation period. The expiry of the collective agreement did not prevent enforcement, since the terms had been incorporated into the officers' contracts and the municipality continued to apply the 12 hour shift system for a period after the agreement expired. The court found that the award was capable of practical implementation and dismissed the respondent's counter-application. The municipality was ordered to comply immediately with the award, specifically by reinstating the 12 hour shift...
- Citation
- [2016] ZALCJHB 394
- Parties
- Applicant: IMATU obo its Members; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2016
- Case Number
- JR3058/14
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court Under Section 158(1)(c) of the Lra; Counter Application to Set Aside Award
- Outcome
- Application granted; arbitration award made an order of court; respondent's counter-application dismissed; costs awarded to applicant.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Section 158 1 C Application, Essential Service Arbitration, Collective Agreement Expiry, Incorporation Into Contract, Shift System Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IMATU obo its Members
Applicant
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court Under Section 158(1)(c) of the Lra; Counter Application to Set Aside Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration award made under section 74(4) of the LRA should be made an order of court under section 158(1)(c).
- 2 Whether the expiry of the collective agreement prevents enforcement of the award.
- 3 Whether the award is capable of practical implementation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the arbitrator's award was legally binding and enforceable, as it converted the status quo of the 12 hour shift system into a binding arrangement after the expiry of the six-month negotiation period. The expiry of the collective agreement did not prevent enforcement, since the terms had been incorporated into the officers' contracts and the municipality continued to apply the 12 hour shift system for a period after the agreement expired. The court found that the award was capable of practical implementation and dismissed the respondent's counter-application. The municipality was ordered to comply immediately with the award, specifically by reinstating the 12 hour shift...
Court Disposition
Application granted; arbitration award made an order of court; respondent's counter-application dismissed; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- The arbitration award of Mr T Boyce under case number MD031303 dated 21 March 2014 is made an order of court under section 158(1)(c) of the LRA.
- The respondent must immediately reinstate the 12 hour shift system which existed prior to 1 May 2013 in the Metro Police Department.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment