IMATU v Kommissie vir Versoening, Bemmdeling en Arbitrasie, Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit (C 185/99) [1999] ZALC 167 (1 December 1999)
The Labour Court found that the arbitrator had failed to exercise his statutory powers under section 138(9) of the Labour Relations Act by not granting appropriate relief after finding a breach of the affirmative action agreement. The arbitrator's refusal to grant the requested relief was based on an incorrect jurisdictional interpretation and a failure to apply his mind to the evidence and the relief sought. The Court held that the breach of the collective agreement constituted an unfair labour practice relating to promotion and that the applicant's member was entitled to the salary and benefits she would have received had she been appointed to the relevant position. The arbitration...
- Citation
- [1999] ZALC 167
- Parties
- Applicant: IMATU; Respondent: Kommissie vir Versoening, Bemiddeling en Arbitrasie; Respondent: Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 1999
- Case Number
- C 185/99
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The arbitration award was reviewed and set aside to the extent that relief was refused. The award was substituted with an order that the applicant's member, Ms M De Swardt, is entitled to the same salary and benefits she would have received had she been appointed to the position of Accountant: Housing and...
- Judges
- Basson R
- Legal Topics
- Review of Arbitration Award, Collective Agreement Breach, Affirmative Action, Unfair Labour Practice, Promotion Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IMATU
Applicant
Kommissie vir Versoening, Bemiddeling en Arbitrasie
Respondent
Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator failed to exercise his powers under section 138(9) of the Labour Relations Act to grant appropriate relief.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator erred in refusing to grant the relief sought by the applicant regarding breach of the affirmative action agreement.
- 3 Whether the applicant's member was subjected to an unfair labour practice relating to promotion.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court found that the arbitrator had failed to exercise his statutory powers under section 138(9) of the Labour Relations Act by not granting appropriate relief after finding a breach of the affirmative action agreement. The arbitrator's refusal to grant the requested relief was based on an incorrect jurisdictional interpretation and a failure to apply his mind to the evidence and the relief sought. The Court held that the breach of the collective agreement constituted an unfair labour practice relating to promotion and that the applicant's member was entitled to the salary and benefits she would have received had she been appointed to the relevant position. The arbitration...
Court Disposition
The arbitration award was reviewed and set aside to the extent that relief was refused. The award was substituted with an order that the applicant's member, Ms M De Swardt, is entitled to the same salary and benefits she would have received had she been appointed to the position of Accountant: Housing and...
Orders
- The arbitration award of the second respondent under case number WE16816 is reviewed and set aside insofar as relief was refused.
- The award is substituted with an order that the applicant's member, Ms M De Swardt, is entitled to the same salary and benefits she would have received had she been appointed to the position of Accountant: Housing and Miscellaneous at post level VI, with retrospective effect from 1 August 1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment