Impala Platinum (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers and Others (J504/97) [1997] ZALC 5 (8 August 1997)

Impala Platinum (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers and Others (J504/97) [1997] ZALC 5 (8 August 1997)

The court found that the respondents, while participating in a protected strike, failed to comply with picketing rules established by the CCMA. Their conduct included intimidation and obstruction, which disrupted mine operations and posed a significant risk of a chemical leak, endangering human life. The urgency and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] ZALC 5
Parties
Applicant: Impala Platinum (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: National Union of Mineworkers; Respondent: J Apadile and the persons listed on Annexure W1
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
J504/97
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Relief
Outcome
Interim relief granted in favour of the applicant.
Judges
E Revelas
Legal Topics
Protected Strike, Picketing Rules, Interim Relief, Balance of Convenience
Labour Law Protected Strike Picketing Rules Interim Relief Balance of Convenience

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Impala Platinum (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

National Union of Mineworkers

Respondent

J Apadile and the persons listed on Annexure W1

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Interim Relief

  1. 1 Whether the conduct of the respondents during the protected strike justified the granting of interim relief.
  2. 2 Whether the picketing rules set by the CCMA were adhered to by the respondents.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience favoured the applicant in granting urgent relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents, while participating in a protected strike, failed to comply with picketing rules established by the CCMA. Their conduct included intimidation and obstruction, which disrupted mine operations and posed a significant risk of a chemical leak, endangering human life. The urgency and seriousness of the situation justified the granting of interim relief. The balance of convenience clearly favoured the applicant, and the lack of formal opposition or attendance by the respondents further supported the decision to grant the order without adherence to standard procedural requirements.

Court Disposition

Interim relief granted in favour of the applicant.

Orders

  • The respondents are interdicted from intimidating temporary workers and obstructing access to the mine.
  • The respondents are ordered to comply with the picketing rules set by the CCMA.