Imperial Bank v Lanseria International Airport (Pty) Ltd (A154/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 119; [2016] 2 All SA 812 (GP) (30 March 2016)
The Full Court found that the respondent had locus standi to cancel the lease and seek eviction of the appellant. The evidence established, on a balance of probabilities, that a tacit cession of the lease agreement occurred between Southern and the respondent, and that all parties acted for over a decade on the basis that the respondent was the sub-lessor. The Avfin lease, although not listed in the annexure to the head-lease, was treated by all parties as subject to cession and the respondent was recognised as entitled to enforce its terms. The purported suspensive condition in the head-lease requiring written cession was unnecessary in law, as the transfer of ownership and contractual...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 119
- Parties
- Appellant: Imperial Bank; Respondent: Lanseria International Airport (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2016
- Case Number
- A154/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Judgment of Pretorius J, Following Referral to Oral Evidence on Locus Standi, Waiver, and Estoppel
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Costs awarded against the appellant on the attorney and client scale, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- W R C Prinsloo, V V Tlhapi, T Vilakazi
- Legal Topics
- Tacit Cession, Privity of Contract, Locus Standi, Lease Cancellation, Attorney and Client Costs, Sale and Leaseback
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Imperial Bank
Appellant
Lanseria International Airport (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Judgment of Pretorius J, Following Referral to Oral Evidence on Locus Standi, Waiver, and Estoppel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent had locus standi to cancel the lease and seek eviction of the appellant.
- 2 Whether a tacit cession of the lease agreement occurred between the relevant parties.
- 3 Whether the head-lease was void for non-compliance with a purported suspensive condition.
Ratio Decidendi
The Full Court found that the respondent had locus standi to cancel the lease and seek eviction of the appellant. The evidence established, on a balance of probabilities, that a tacit cession of the lease agreement occurred between Southern and the respondent, and that all parties acted for over a decade on the basis that the respondent was the sub-lessor. The Avfin lease, although not listed in the annexure to the head-lease, was treated by all parties as subject to cession and the respondent was recognised as entitled to enforce its terms. The purported suspensive condition in the head-lease requiring written cession was unnecessary in law, as the transfer of ownership and contractual...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Costs awarded against the appellant on the attorney and client scale, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The respondent is ordered to pay the costs of the appellant on the scale as between attorney and client, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment