Imperial Logistics South African Group (Pty) Ltd v Leso (Application for Leave to Appeal) (JR 2425/22) [2025] ZALCJHB 150 (23 April 2025)

Imperial Logistics South African Group (Pty) Ltd v Leso (Application for Leave to Appeal) (JR 2425/22) [2025] ZALCJHB 150 (23 April 2025)

The court considered the grounds for leave to appeal as set out by the first respondent and, applying section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Superior Courts Act, found that the requirements for granting leave to appeal were satisfied. The absence of opposition from the applicant was noted. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted to the first respondent against the judgment and orders dated 5 March 2025.

Citation
[2025] ZALCJHB 150
Parties
Applicant: Imperial Logistics South Africa Group (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Raymond Mokakatla Leso; Respondent: Commissioner Letsema Mokoena N.O; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 April 2025
Case Number
JR 2425/22
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal is granted to the first respondent against the judgment and orders dated 5 March 2025.
Judges
S Swartz
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Superior Courts Act, Review of Arbitration Award
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Superior Courts Act Review of Arbitration Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Imperial Logistics South Africa Group (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Raymond Mokakatla Leso

Respondent

Commissioner Letsema Mokoena N.O

Respondent

Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the grounds for leave to appeal in terms of section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Superior Courts Act are satisfied.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the first respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered the grounds for leave to appeal as set out by the first respondent and, applying section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Superior Courts Act, found that the requirements for granting leave to appeal were satisfied. The absence of opposition from the applicant was noted. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted to the first respondent against the judgment and orders dated 5 March 2025.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is granted to the first respondent against the judgment and orders dated 5 March 2025.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted to the first respondent.