Ex parte: National Director of Public Prosecutions (168/2018) [2018] ZAFSHC 9 (9 March 2018)

Ex parte: National Director of Public Prosecutions (168/2018) [2018] ZAFSHC 9 (9 March 2018)

The court found that the applicant had established reasonable grounds to believe that the property described in Annexure A, including the farm Krynaauws Lust 275 and funds totalling R40,360,154.98, are proceeds of crime or instrumentality of offences as contemplated by POCA. The risk of dissipation or concealment...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] ZAFSHC 9
Parties
Applicant: National Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
168/2018
Procedural Posture
Ex Parte Application / Preservation Order Under POCA
Outcome
Preservation order granted under section 38(2) of POCA; curator bonis appointed; property preserved pending forfeiture proceedings.
Judges
AF Jordaan
Legal Topics
Prevention of Organised Crime Act, Preservation Order, Curator Bonis Appointment, Forfeiture Proceedings
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Prevention of Organised Crime Act Preservation Order Curator Bonis Appointment Forfeiture Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Director of Public Prosecutions

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Ex Parte Application / Preservation Order Under POCA

  1. 1 Whether the requirements for a preservation order under section 38 of POCA are satisfied.
  2. 2 Whether the property described in Annexure A constitutes proceeds of crime or an instrumentality of an offence.
  3. 3 What powers and duties should be conferred upon the curator bonis to preserve the property pending forfeiture proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established reasonable grounds to believe that the property described in Annexure A, including the farm Krynaauws Lust 275 and funds totalling R40,360,154.98, are proceeds of crime or instrumentality of offences as contemplated by POCA. The risk of dissipation or concealment justified urgent intervention. The court granted a preservation order under section 38(2) of POCA, appointed a curator bonis with broad powers to preserve and manage the property, and set out detailed procedures for notification, service, and opposition by interested parties. The order ensures that the property is safeguarded pending the outcome of forfeiture proceedings, and...

Court Disposition

Preservation order granted under section 38(2) of POCA; curator bonis appointed; property preserved pending forfeiture proceedings.

Orders

  • An order is granted in terms of section 38(2) of POCA preserving the property described in Annexure A.
  • All persons with knowledge of the order are prohibited from disposing of, encumbering, dissipating, interfering with, or dealing with the property.