Info Plus v Scheelke and Another (381/96) [1998] ZASCA 21; 1998 (3) SA 184 (SCA); [1998] 2 All SA 509 (A) (25 March 1998)

Info Plus v Scheelke and Another (381/96) [1998] ZASCA 21; 1998 (3) SA 184 (SCA); [1998] 2 All SA 509 (A) (25 March 1998)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the conditional delivery of the Mercedes Benz 230 TE under the hire-purchase agreement sufficed for transfer of ownership upon fulfilment of the condition, namely payment of the outstanding balance. It was not necessary for the purchaser to be in possession of the vehicle at the time the condition was fulfilled. The court rejected the notion that a second act of delivery or a further real agreement was required at the material time. The payment made by the second respondent to Wesbank extinguished the appellant's indebtedness and fulfilled the condition, resulting in the appellant acquiring ownership. On the estoppel defence, the court found that the...

Citation
[1998] ZASCA 21
Parties
Appellant: Info Plus; Respondent: J Scheelke; Respondent: McCarthy Retail Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
25 March 1998
Case Number
381/96
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Witwatersrand Local Division
Outcome
Appeal allowed. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with an order for delivery of the vehicle to the appellant and costs against the defendants.
Judges
Van Heerden, Hefer, Eksteen, Nienaber, Howie
Legal Topics
Transfer of Ownership, Hire Purchase, Estoppel, Delivery of Corporeal Movable Property
Commercial and Corporate Land and Property Transfer of Ownership Hire Purchase Estoppel Delivery of Corporeal Movable Property

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Info Plus

Appellant

J Scheelke

Respondent

McCarthy Retail Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Witwatersrand Local Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether ownership of the Mercedes Benz 230 TE passed to the appellant upon payment of the outstanding balance under the hire-purchase agreement.
  2. 2 Whether physical possession by the purchaser at the time of fulfilment of the suspensive condition is required for transfer of ownership.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's conduct gave rise to an estoppel preventing it from asserting ownership against the second respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the conditional delivery of the Mercedes Benz 230 TE under the hire-purchase agreement sufficed for transfer of ownership upon fulfilment of the condition, namely payment of the outstanding balance. It was not necessary for the purchaser to be in possession of the vehicle at the time the condition was fulfilled. The court rejected the notion that a second act of delivery or a further real agreement was required at the material time. The payment made by the second respondent to Wesbank extinguished the appellant's indebtedness and fulfilled the condition, resulting in the appellant acquiring ownership. On the estoppel defence, the court found that the...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with an order for delivery of the vehicle to the appellant and costs against the defendants.

Orders

  • The first defendant is ordered to deliver to the plaintiff a Mercedes Benz 230 TE vehicle, registration number MPB 105T.
  • The costs of the suit are to be paid by the defendants jointly and severally.