Integer Mortgage Spv (Pty) Ltd v Prinsloo and Another (56054/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 707 (15 September 2014)

The court found, after reconsidering its judgment and the arguments presented, that there is no reasonable possibility that another court would reach a different conclusion on the facts. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must fail.

Citation: [2014] ZAGPPHC 707
Parties: Applicant: Integer Mortgage SPV (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Cornelius Petrus Mouritz Prinsloo; Respondent: Lente Anna Maria Prinsloo
Court: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction: South Africa
Judgment Date: 15 September 2014
Case Number: 56054/2013
Procedural Posture: Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs on an attorney and client scale.
Judges: C Pretorius
Legal Topics: Leave to Appeal, Costs Order

Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Integer Mortgage SPV (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Cornelius Petrus Mouritz Prinsloo

Respondent

Lente Anna Maria Prinsloo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether there is a reasonable prospect that another court would come to a different conclusion on the facts.
2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs on an attorney and client scale.

Orders

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs on an attorney and client scale.