Investec Bank Limited v Big Business Innovations Group (Pty) Ltd (046686/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1895 (6 November 2023)

Investec Bank Limited v Big Business Innovations Group (Pty) Ltd (046686/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1895 (6 November 2023)

The respondent, Big Business Innovations Group (Pty) Ltd, failed to deliver any substantive answering affidavit or heads of argument, despite ample opportunity and court directives. The explanations for delay and requests for stay, access to documents, and forensic examination were found to be unsubstantiated and unreasonable. The respondent did not advance any substantive defence to the winding-up application, nor did it adequately explain how further documents or forensic analysis would enable such a defence. The applicant, Investec Bank Limited, established that the respondent is unable to pay its debts, as evidenced by certified demands and the failure to pay substantial amounts under...

Citation
[2023] ZAGPPHC 1895
Parties
Applicant: Investec Bank Limited; Respondent: Big Business Innovations Group (Pty) Ltd
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
6 November 2023
Case Number
046686/2022
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Application / Return Day of Provisional Winding Up Order; Confirmation of Final Winding Up
Outcome
Provisional winding-up order confirmed; respondent placed under final winding-up; counter-application dismissed with costs.
Judges
SJ Cowen
Legal Topics
Company Liquidation, Unable to Pay Debts, Provisional Winding Up, Final Winding Up Order, Security Cession, Forensic Document Examination
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Company Liquidation Unable to Pay Debts Provisional Winding Up Final Winding Up Order Security Cession Forensic Document Examination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Investec Bank Limited

Applicant

Big Business Innovations Group (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Winding Up Application / Return Day of Provisional Winding Up Order; Confirmation of Final Winding Up

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is unable to pay its debts as contemplated by section 344(f) read with section 345(c) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 and item 9 of Schedule 5 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has bona fide disputed its indebtedness to the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the counter-application for stay, access to documents, and forensic examination should be granted or dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent, Big Business Innovations Group (Pty) Ltd, failed to deliver any substantive answering affidavit or heads of argument, despite ample opportunity and court directives. The explanations for delay and requests for stay, access to documents, and forensic examination were found to be unsubstantiated and unreasonable. The respondent did not advance any substantive defence to the winding-up application, nor did it adequately explain how further documents or forensic analysis would enable such a defence. The applicant, Investec Bank Limited, established that the respondent is unable to pay its debts, as evidenced by certified demands and the failure to pay substantial amounts under...

Court Disposition

Provisional winding-up order confirmed; respondent placed under final winding-up; counter-application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The rule nisi of 29 November 2022 and extended from time to time is confirmed and the respondent is placed under final winding-up.
  • The costs of the application are to be costs in the winding-up of the respondent.