Investec Bank Ltd and Another v Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd (45/LM/May09) [2009] ZACT 50 (30 July 2009)
- Citation
- [2009] ZACT 50
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, M Mokuena, M Holden
- Case number
- 45/LM/May09
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, M Mokuena, M Holden
- Case number
- 45/LM/May09
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties, as neither Investec Bank Ltd nor Business Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltd are involved in the hotel and leisure industry in which Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd operates. The Commission's investigation confirmed that the transaction would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition. Furthermore, no public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The merger between Investec Bank Ltd, Business Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltd, and Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd is unconditionally approved.
- No conditions are attached to the approval.
02
Material facts
Parties
Investec Bank Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Cliffe Dekker HofmeyrBusiness Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Cliffe Dekker HofmeyrStella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Investec Shareholding Acquired: ZAR 30
- Manco SPV Shareholding Acquired: ZAR 24.5
- Richtrau Shareholding Post Merger: ZAR 13
- Staff Trust Shareholding Post Merger: ZAR 5.5
- BEE Shareholders Post Merger: ZAR 27
03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Control / Merger Clearance
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed acquisition of shares in Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd by Investec Bank Ltd and Business Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltd is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
- 02
Whether there are any public interest concerns arising from the transaction.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants argued that the transaction represents an investment opportunity in the hotel and leisure industry, which is expected to experience significant growth. They submitted that neither Investec nor Manco SPV are involved in the hotel and leisure sector, and thus there is no overlap with the target firm's activities. The transaction will enable Protea Group to continue as a viable going concern.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission submitted that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties, as the acquiring firms are not active in the hotel and leisure industry. The Commission concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raised no public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
- 02
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
The Tribunal must consider public interest issues when assessing a merger.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties, as neither Investec Bank Ltd nor Business Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltd are involved in the hotel and leisure industry in which Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd operates. The Commission's investigation confirmed that the transaction would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition. Furthermore, no public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the hotel and leisure industry is viewed as having significant growth potential, which motivated the investment.
- The transaction enables Protea Group to continue operating as a viable going concern.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
- The merger between Investec Bank Ltd, Business Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltd, and Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd is unconditionally approved.
- No conditions are attached to the approval.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL SOUTH AFRICA
Case NO: 45/LM/May09
In the matter between:
Investec Bank Ltd
Business Venture Investments NO 1343 (Pty) Ltd Acquiring Firms
And
Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd Target Firm
Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member); M Mokuena (Tribunal Member) and M Holden (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 08 July 2009
Decided on : 08 July 2009
Reasons Issued on : 30 July 2009
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 08 July 2009 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate unconditionally approving the merger between Investec
Bank Ltd and Business Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltdâs acquisition of Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd. The reasons for the decision appear below.
Parties
[2] The acquiring firms are Investec Bank Ltd (âInvestecâ) and Business Venture Investments No 1343 (Pty) Ltd (âManco SPVâ). These companies are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Investec falls within a group of companies controlled
by Investec Ltd.1 Investec controls Grayinvest Ltd and Reichmans Ltd.2 Manco SPV is a newly formed entity and it does not control any firm.3
[3] The primary target firm is Stella Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd (âSGHâ)4 a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa. SGH is controlled by Richtrau No. 278 (Pty) Ltd (âRichtrauâ).5
Transaction
[4] In terms of the proposed transaction, Investec intends to acquire 30% shares and Manco SPV 24.5% shares with minority protection rights in SGH. The other investors in SGH are Richtrau with 13%; Staff Trust with 5.5% and BEE shareholders with 27%. Post merger Investec and Manco SPV will have control over SGH.
Parties Activities
[5] The Investec Group is an international, specialist banking group that provides a diverse range of financial products and services to a niche client base. Its principal business activities can be divided into the following: investment banking,6 treasury and specialised finance,7 private client activities incorporating private banking and private client portfolio management and stock broking, and assets management.8
[6] Manco SPV is a newly formed shelf company which has not previously traded.
[7] Through its subsidiaries SGH owns and controls various hotels in South Africa and internationally in Namibia, Malawi, Tanzania, Kenya, Nigeria, Zambia, Ghana and Uganda which operate under the brand âProtea Hotelsâ.
Rationale for the Transaction
[8] The Investec Group views the proposed transaction as an attractive opportunity to invest in the hotel and leisure industry in South Africa. The parties submit that the industry is seen as having significant growth potential in the future.
[9] From Protea Groupâs perspective the proposed transaction enables it to continue a viable going concern.
Competition Analysis
[10] The Commission found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties as both the acquiring firms are not involved in the activities of the target firm which is active in the hotel and leisure industry. We agree with the Commission that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition.
Conclusion
[11] There are no public interest issues and accordingly the transaction is unconditionally approved.
_______ 30 July 2009
Y Carrim Date
Tribunal Member
M Mokuena and M Holden concurring
Tribunal Researcher : Jabulani Ngobeni
For the merging parties : Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
For the Commission : Mogalane Matsimela (Mergers and Acquisitions)
1 Investec Ltd is a public company listed on the JSE. Investec Ltd controls the following entities in South Africa: Investec Group Data (Pty) Ltd; Investec Management Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Investec Property Group Holdings Ltd; Investec Assurance Ltd; Investec Employee Benefits Holdings Ltd; Fedsure International Ltd; Investec Securities Ltd and Investec Private Trust Ltd.
2 Grayinvest Ltd controls Investec Investments Ltd and Metboard Holdings Ltd. Reichmans Ltd does not control any firm.
3 Manco SPV is jointly controlled by the following trusts: Burgundy Trust; Vienna Trust and Jubie Trust.
4 SGH controls the following entities: Protea Group Holdings (Pty)Ltd; Protea Hospitality Group(Pty)Ltd; Protea Group Holdings (Pty)Ltd;
Protea Hotels Corporation (Pty)Ltd; Protea Hospitality Holdings (Pty)Ltd; Protea Hospitality Corporation (Pty)Ltd.
5
As part of the transaction, Richtrau will acquire 100% of the shares in and claims against SGH from Protea Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Australia.
6Investec Groupâs investment banking involves corporate finance, private equity, direct investment and institutional research, sales and trading.
7 Its specialised finance includes non-private client deposit-taking, corporate and public sector lending, structuring and proprietary trading
activities, financial markets activities and banking activities.
8 Its assets management involves assurance activities, portfolio management and investments products.
3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.